Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> But not the real reason! The intention behind using std::map was
| Lars> to get only unique command sequences (strings), a std::map gives
| Lars> that for free. I did not
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> But not the real reason! The intention behind using std::map was
Lars> to get only unique command sequences (strings), a std::map gives
Lars> that for free. I did not think about the order issue then.
OK. However, there is alr
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> handling, and | saw several things: | | - the bindings are not
| Lars> saved in a map. Lars did you do this just for
|
| Lars> s/not/now?
|
| Indeed.
|
| Lars> O(log n)
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> handling, and | saw several things: | | - the bindings are not
Lars> saved in a map. Lars did you do this just for
Lars> s/not/now?
Indeed.
Lars> O(log n) instead of O(n).
That's a good reason.
Lars> Ok this can be fixed b
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I was looking at add an lyxrc option \handle_x_deadkeys which could be
| set to false for people who want the normal dead keys handling, and
| saw several things:
|
| - the bindings are not saved in a map. Lars did you do this just for
s/not/now
I was looking at add an lyxrc option \handle_x_deadkeys which could be
set to false for people who want the normal dead keys handling, and
saw several things:
- the bindings are not saved in a map. Lars did you do this just for
fun, or is there a real reason? The problem is that it makes thing
