On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 05:41:56PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>
> > On 13/10/2008 21:31, Georg Baum wrote:
> >> Both ascii and latin1 are a subset of utf8,
> >
> > ascii certainly but latin1, I don't think so, AFAIK. latin1 is a subset
> > of ucs4/utf32, is that what you
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 05:40:51PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > Or slurp in the contents of the .tex file and try various encodings
> > until we find one that "does the trick", possibly after cutting it
> > into parts for which we know that the encoding stays constant.
>
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> On 13/10/2008 21:31, Georg Baum wrote:
>> Both ascii and latin1 are a subset of utf8,
>
> ascii certainly but latin1, I don't think so, AFAIK. latin1 is a subset
> of ucs4/utf32, is that what you meant?
Of course you are right, I mixed that up. So if tex2lyx detects a
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Or slurp in the contents of the .tex file and try various encodings
> until we find one that "does the trick", possibly after cutting it
> into parts for which we know that the encoding stays constant.
Yes. Note that this can become quite tricky, though: Some variable width
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 12:19:28AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
BTW, does the fact that you are now working on this mean that the
tex2lyx-python ghost is finally dead?
What was this ghost?
Some people were pondering re-doing tex2lyx in python. There even seems
s
Andre Poenitz schrieb:
So I am glad to hear that I am allowed to contribute to this excellent
piece of code even if only one developer agrees with me.
You are welcome ;-)
regards Uwe
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 12:19:28AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> > BTW, does the fact that you are now working on this mean that the
> > tex2lyx-python ghost is finally dead?
>
> What was this ghost?
Some people were pondering re-doing tex2lyx in python. There even seems
some bits of python out there
> BTW, does the fact that you are now working on this mean that the
> tex2lyx-python ghost is finally dead?
What was this ghost? I'm now working for over a year on tex2lyx, fixed many bugs and added lots of
new features for every past LyX 1.5.x release. Also JMarc and Jürgen contributed a lot, s
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 11:17:56PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > That assertion seems incompatible with e.g. line 2244-2249 in
> > tex2lyx/text.cpp, which, incidentally have been changed last by you.
>
> Once upon a time,
That was 03/03/03 18:4
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That assertion seems incompatible with e.g. line 2244-2249 in
> tex2lyx/text.cpp, which, incidentally have been changed last by you.
Once upon a time, a lazy gremlin decided that latin1 German umlauts were
an absolute prerequisite for a tex->lyx converte
On 13/10/2008 21:31, Georg Baum wrote:
Both ascii and latin1 are a subset of utf8,
ascii certainly but latin1, I don't think so, AFAIK. latin1 is a subset
of ucs4/utf32, is that what you meant?
Abdel.
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 11:02:12PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Acually I think we should switch .lyx encoding to utf8 for good. Of
> > course, the parameter to \inputencoding can and should be kept and if
> > possible used in the output, but ot
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Acually I think we should switch .lyx encoding to utf8 for good. Of
> course, the parameter to \inputencoding can and should be kept and if
> possible used in the output, but otherwise there is no real reason to
> keep an uncertain encoding in the .lyx fo
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 09:31:34PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>
> > "magic" does not help in general as we will still stay sticked where we
> > are. We need a general solution to be able to create a lyxformat newer
> > than 248. I attached a LyX file and its TeX output. This one c
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> "magic" does not help in general as we will still stay sticked where we
> are. We need a general solution to be able to create a lyxformat newer
> than 248. I attached a LyX file and its TeX output. This one compiles fine
> with latex and pdflatex. The exercise we have is to imp
>> So, does this completely fix this? Or is there still work to be done
>> with the inputenc stuff?
>
> I guess there's a lot left. But I'll approach that on a case-by-case
> base. Better get known cases right instead of being stuck for years
> while waiting for perfect solutions to appear magical
16 matches
Mail list logo
