Richard Heck wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Richard Heck wrote:
By the way, is there a short-cut to launch this dialog? If not I'd
like to have one; any suggestion?
I also think that we should put a new button in the math toolbar to
launch the delimiter dialog without having to go first to th
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Richard Heck wrote:
>>> By the way, is there a short-cut to launch this dialog? If not I'd
>>> like to have one; any suggestion?
>>> I also think that we should put a new button in the math toolbar to
>>> launch the delimiter dialog without having to go first to the math
Richard Heck schrieb:
Yes, it's not that you don't use a mouse, it's that you don't want to
have to take your hands off the keyboard. Anything I can do with the
keyboard I can do more quickly.
Yes of course, that's the reason why I seldomly use this dialog but the shortcuts "M-m (" to insert
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 05:02:35PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> > Then I suggest that we switch to a wigdet list instead.
> With smaller icons it will fit nicely on
> > screen.
>
> The dialog looks now much better, thanks!
>
> >> Edwin, what was the reason for the dialog change?
> >
> > The most im
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 11:35:28AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>
> > if (!big || str == "(" || str == ")" || str == "[" || str == "]")
> > -return str;
> > +return fromqstr(str);
>
> By the way, is there a reason why single char delimiter is ex
Richard Heck wrote:
By the way, is there a short-cut to launch this dialog? If not I'd
like to have one; any suggestion?
I also think that we should put a new button in the math toolbar to
launch the delimiter dialog without having to go first to the math
panel. And we need a new menu item:
In
> By the way, is there a short-cut to launch this dialog? If not I'd
> like to have one; any suggestion?
> I also think that we should put a new button in the math toolbar to
> launch the delimiter dialog without having to go first to the math
> panel. And we need a new menu item:
> Insert->Mat
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>> >> Edwin, what was the reason for the dialog change?
>> >
>> > The most important reason I guess is that you are forced to use
>> the mouse.
>>
>> Could this be a real reason? Who is using LyX without a mouse?
> Of course it is a real reason. The l
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Then I suggest that we switch to a wigdet list instead. With smaller
icons it will fit nicely on
> screen.
The dialog looks now much better, thanks!
You're pretty welcome :-)
>> Edwin, what was the reason for the dialog change?
>
> The most important reason I guess
> Then I suggest that we switch to a wigdet list instead. With smaller icons it
will fit nicely on
> screen.
The dialog looks now much better, thanks!
>> Edwin, what was the reason for the dialog change?
>
> The most important reason I guess is that you are forced to use the mouse.
Could this
Edwin Leuven wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
PS: Edwin, the request for beautifying the dialog still stands.
what the problem? make the list widget exactly fit the contents?
Yes. Horizontally and Vertically (i.e. no scrollbar by default and if
possible)
Abdel.
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
PS: Edwin, the request for beautifying the dialog still stands.
what the problem? make the list widget exactly fit the contents?
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
But anyway, the dialog of LyX 1.4.x is much simpler to work with as
you see everything with one look.
Then I suggest that we switch to a wigdet list instead. With smaller
icons it will fit nicely on
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>> While trying to fix bug 3420 I noticed that LyX 1.5 comes with a new
delimiter dialog. This
>> dialog is less clear to keep the overview about the different
delimiters. The dialog of LyX 1.4.x
>> is
>> better and quicker to handle as you just need to click on the
delimi
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
But anyway, the dialog of LyX 1.4.x is much simpler to work with as
you see everything with one look.
Then I suggest that we switch to a wigdet list instead. With smaller
icons it will fit nicely on screen.
Any objection i
>> While trying to fix bug 3420 I noticed that LyX 1.5 comes with a new
delimiter dialog. This
>> dialog is less clear to keep the overview about the different delimiters.
The dialog of LyX 1.4.x
>> is
>> better and quicker to handle as you just need to click on the delimiter you
want than scro
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
But anyway, the dialog of LyX 1.4.x is much simpler to work with as
you see everything with one look.
Then I suggest that we switch to a wigdet list instead. With smaller
icons it will fit nicely on screen.
Any objection if I do that?
Abdel.
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
While trying to fix bug 3420 I noticed that LyX 1.5 comes with a new
delimiter dialog. This dialog is less clear to keep the overview about
the different delimiters. The dialog of LyX 1.4.x is better and quicker
to handle as you just need to click on the delimiter you want than
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
While trying to fix bug 3420 I noticed that LyX 1.5 comes with a new
delimiter dialog. This dialog is less clear to keep the overview about
the different delimiters. The dialog of LyX 1.4.x is better and
quicker to handle as you just need to click on t
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
if (!big || str == "(" || str == ")" || str == "[" || str == "]")
-return str;
+return fromqstr(str);
By the way, is there a reason why single char delimiter is excluded from
'big'. The above code look very suspicious to me. Shouldn't it be:
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 10:11:24AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 01:31:47AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> >
> >> The problem of bug 3420 is that the items for the empty delimiter is added
> >> by this code
> >>
> >>leftCO->addItem(QIcon(QPi
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 09:35:16AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 01:31:47AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> >
> >> The problem of bug 3420 is that the items for the empty delimiter is added
> >> by this code
> >>
> >>leftCO->addItem(QIcon(QPi
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 01:31:47AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
The problem of bug 3420 is that the items for the empty delimiter is added by
this code
leftCO->addItem(QIcon(QPixmap(toqstr(empty_xpm))), qt_("(None)"));
instead of
leftCO->addItem(QIcon(QPix
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
While trying to fix bug 3420 I noticed that LyX 1.5 comes with a new
delimiter dialog. This dialog is less clear to keep the overview about
the different delimiters. The dialog of LyX 1.4.x is better and quicker
to handle as you just need to click on the delimiter you want than
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 01:31:47AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
The problem of bug 3420 is that the items for the empty delimiter is added by
this code
leftCO->addItem(QIcon(QPixmap(toqstr(empty_xpm))), qt_("(None)"));
instead of
leftCO->addItem(QIcon(QPix
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 01:31:47AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> The problem of bug 3420 is that the items for the empty delimiter is added by
> this code
>
> leftCO->addItem(QIcon(QPixmap(toqstr(empty_xpm))), qt_("(None)"));
>
> instead of
> leftCO->addItem(QIcon(QPixmap(toqstr(empty_x
While trying to fix bug 3420 I noticed that LyX 1.5 comes with a new delimiter dialog. This dialog
is less clear to keep the overview about the different delimiters. The dialog of LyX 1.4.x is better
and quicker to handle as you just need to click on the delimiter you want than scrolling down two
27 matches
Mail list logo
