Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> > I just find out that the --with-version-suffix=-1.4.0cvs-qt does not
> > works anymore for lyx, lyxclient and tex2lyx, which clobber the
> > current installed lyx working version.
> >
> > Does this deserve a bugz
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> I also observed this. In practice the specified suffix does not get
> attached to the installed binaries. They are installed as
> lyx, lyxclient and tex2lyx instead of lyx-1.4.0cvs-qt etc.
> This also happens when not explicitly specifying a suffix, i.e., when
> merely us
Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> > I just find out that the --with-version-suffix=-1.4.0cvs-qt does not
> > works anymore for lyx, lyxclient and tex2lyx, which clobber the
> > current installed lyx working version.
> >
> > Does this deserve a bugzi
Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> I just find out that the --with-version-suffix=-1.4.0cvs-qt does not
> works anymore for lyx, lyxclient and tex2lyx, which clobber the
> current installed lyx working version.
>
> Does this deserve a bugzilla message ?
IMO yes. What is wrong? For once, it seems to wor
Hello,
I just find out that the --with-version-suffix=-1.4.0cvs-qt does not
works anymore for lyx, lyxclient and tex2lyx, which clobber the
current installed lyx working version.
Does this deserve a bugzilla message ?
--
Jean-Pierre
