Re: Towards 2.4.0: required gcc version

Le 07/06/2019 à 16:56, Pavel Sanda a écrit : On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 11:51:52PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 06/06/2019 ?? 22:42, Pavel Sanda a écrit : On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 04:12:22PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: I guess that nobody will mourn the removal of gcc 4.6 suppor

Re: Towards 2.4.0: required gcc version

Le 07/06/2019 à 16:56, Pavel Sanda a écrit : On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 11:51:52PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 06/06/2019 ?? 22:42, Pavel Sanda a écrit : On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 04:12:22PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: I guess that nobody will mourn the removal of gcc 4.6 support,

Re: Towards 2.4.0: required gcc version

On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 11:51:52PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 06/06/2019 ?? 22:42, Pavel Sanda a écrit : >> On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 04:12:22PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >>> I guess that nobody will mourn the removal of gcc 4.6 support, since >>> ubuntu >>> 12.04 has been unsu

Re: Towards 2.4.0: required gcc version

On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 12:08:57PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > So, shall we consider to move to gcc >= 4/9 with std::regex? Or is it not > worth doing right now? If you don't hurry for the release so we have enough testing time I'd say drop it now... Pavel

Re: Towards 2.4.0: required gcc version

... and for example test the regx-functionality. Jürgen (JWS) Am 07.06.2019 um 15:10 schrieb Jürgen Womser-Schütz: > Maybe I can help a little bit. On my Windows 10 system I can build LyX > with Visual Studio 2017. > > Jürgen (JWS) >

Re: Towards 2.4.0: required gcc version

Maybe I can help a little bit. On my Windows 10 system I can build LyX with Visual Studio 2017. Jürgen (JWS)

Re: Towards 2.4.0: required gcc version

Le 07/06/2019 à 12:37, José Abílio Matos a écrit : On Friday, 7 June 2019 11.08.57 WEST Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: So, shall we consider to move to gcc >= 4/9 with std::regex? Or is it not worth doing right now? JMarc No objection from me to moving to gcc >= 4.9 in 2.4. We still have to ch

Re: Towards 2.4.0: required gcc version

On Friday, 7 June 2019 11.08.57 WEST Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > So, shall we consider to move to gcc >= 4/9 with std::regex? Or is it > not worth doing right now? > > JMarc No objection from me to moving to gcc >= 4.9 in 2.4. -- José Abílio

Re: Towards 2.4.0: required gcc version

Le 07/06/2019 à 11:56, José Abílio Matos a écrit : On Thursday, 6 June 2019 17.25.57 WEST Stephan Witt wrote: CentOS 7 provides gcc 4.8.5 Apple provides clang which is LLVM version 10.0.1 Stephan That is true but it also has available a tool set with gcc 8, currently it is gcc-8.2.1.

Re: Towards 2.4.0: required gcc version

On Thursday, 6 June 2019 17.25.57 WEST Stephan Witt wrote: > CentOS 7 provides gcc 4.8.5 > Apple provides clang which is LLVM version 10.0.1 > > Stephan That is true but it also has available a tool set with gcc 8, currently it is gcc-8.2.1.

Re: Towards 2.4.0: required gcc version

Le 06/06/2019 à 22:42, Pavel Sanda a écrit : On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 04:12:22PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: I guess that nobody will mourn the removal of gcc 4.6 support, since ubuntu 12.04 has been unsupported since 2017. Pavel, would you care? I'd like 4.9 to be still supported. Belo

Re: Towards 2.4.0: required gcc version

On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 04:12:22PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > I guess that nobody will mourn the removal of gcc 4.6 support, since ubuntu > 12.04 has been unsupported since 2017. > > Pavel, would you care? I'd like 4.9 to be still supported. Below that I don't care. Pavel

Re: Towards 2.4.0: required gcc version

Am 06.06.2019 um 16:12 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : > > > I guess that nobody will mourn the removal of gcc 4.6 support, since ubuntu > 12.04 has been unsupported since 2017. > > Pavel, would you care? > > The next step is gcc 4.9, in order to get rid of boost regex. The oldest > supported

Towards 2.4.0: required gcc version

I guess that nobody will mourn the removal of gcc 4.6 support, since ubuntu 12.04 has been unsupported since 2017. Pavel, would you care? The next step is gcc 4.9, in order to get rid of boost regex. The oldest supported ubuntu LTS (16.04) has that. We could even try to go all the way t