Re: Timeout.h

2000-08-16 Thread Juergen Vigna
> And I am not sure that a class is really needed for this, a namespace > with a couple of independant functions looks more correct (or a class > with only static methods until we have good support for namespaces in > all compilers) Well have a look at what I did and let me know! Jürgen

Re: Timeout.h

2000-08-16 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Well I admit you're partially right :), I'll found a solution to this, | just include the GUI dependent stuff after all other includes ;). | | The problem here is not the gui initialition, but the process event stuff. | kapp is needed for kapp->process

Re: Timeout.h

2000-08-16 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 16-Aug-2000 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >| Ok Lars if you want to play around we can do it you change Timeout.h >| and I change it back to be working with the KDE_BUILD! >| >| IMO if you don't find a fix for this le

Re: Timeout.h

2000-08-16 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Juergen, if Lars hasn't done it yet I'll have a go at moving init and | processEvents into frontends. Is a reasonable design something like | a base "GUIMain" class, with two virtual methods init() and | processEvents() ? I don't think those clases have

Re: Timeout.h

2000-08-16 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Ok Lars if you want to play around we can do it you change Timeout.h | and I change it back to be working with the KDE_BUILD! | | IMO if you don't find a fix for this let it in until it does work it | really doesn't matter for now.

Re: Timeout.h

2000-08-16 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 16-Aug-2000 John Levon wrote: > > Juergen, if Lars hasn't done it yet I'll have a go at moving init and > processEvents into frontends. Is a reasonable design something like > a base "GUIMain" class, with two virtual methods init() and > processEvents() ? > > Is there a better name than GUIM

Re: Timeout.h

2000-08-16 Thread John Levon
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, Juergen Vigna wrote: > Ok Lars if you want to play around we can do it you change Timeout.h > and I change it back to be working with the KDE_BUILD! > > IMO if you don't find a fix for this let it in until it does work it > really doesn't matter

Timeout.h

2000-08-16 Thread Juergen Vigna
Ok Lars if you want to play around we can do it you change Timeout.h and I change it back to be working with the KDE_BUILD! IMO if you don't find a fix for this let it in until it does work it really doesn't matter for now. I'll commit the refixed file soon as I change this in m