On Monday 26 March 2007 3:24:15 pm Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> José Matos wrote:
> > On Wednesday 21 March 2007 6:57:50 pm Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >> Personally, I would try to implement the diff algorithm directly in
> >> the core. Would it be so difficult? I have to admit that I do not know
José Matos wrote:
On Wednesday 21 March 2007 6:57:50 pm Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Personally, I would try to implement the diff algorithm directly in
the core. Would it be so difficult? I have to admit that I do not know
the details of the algorithm.
My feeling is that it will be easy to h
On Wednesday 21 March 2007 6:57:50 pm Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Personally, I would try to implement the diff algorithm directly in
> the core. Would it be so difficult? I have to admit that I do not know
> the details of the algorithm.
My feeling is that it will be easy to have it outside,
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
"José" == José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
José> On Tuesday 20 March 2007 10:01:16 am John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
It should be feasible to parse the output of diff and convert it to
a Change Tracking enabled .lyx file. Any interest in such a
converter?
José>
> "José" == José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
José> On Tuesday 20 March 2007 10:01:16 am John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
>> It should be feasible to parse the output of diff and convert it to
>> a Change Tracking enabled .lyx file. Any interest in such a
>> converter?
José> Interest - yes, th
On Tuesday 20 March 2007 10:01:16 am John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
> It should be feasible to parse the output of diff and convert it to a
> Change Tracking enabled .lyx file. Any interest in such a converter?
Interest - yes, this is a recurring theme, time to do it - no. :-)
We have been discussing
An alternative would be to support an RCS format where everything is
explicitly saved forever, so e.g. you not only know when the document
You mean that kind of stuff when you sent out a contract proposal as
.lyx file and the recipient is able to read all earlier versions when he
looks on the f
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Andre Poenitz wrote:
You mean that kind of stuff when you sent out a contract proposal as
.lyx file and the recipient is able to read all earlier versions when he
looks on the file with a text viewer?
I like this idea. This reminds me pretty much of the only reason why
I
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 10:03:14PM +0900, John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
> On 3/16/07, Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 10:51:24PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >I have no problems with that as long as this is a concious decision of
> >the user. However, having th
John McCabe-Dansted wrote:
> On 3/16/07, Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 10:51:24PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I have no problems with that as long as this is a concious decision of
>> the user. However, having things like my user name and
>> modification
On 3/16/07, Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 10:51:24PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have no problems with that as long as this is a concious decision of
the user. However, having things like my user name and modification/access
date dumped silently into the f
Andre Poenitz wrote:
I have no problems with that as long as this is a concious decision of
the user. However, having things like my user name and modification/access
date dumped silently into the file is no option.
Lyx already have tools->preferences->identity.
Currently, you may enter a nam
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 10:51:24PM +0100,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Metadata repository and search possibilities like Nepomuk are coming on
>> the Linux Desktop. I think it will be important that LyX files can be
>> easily indexed in these new systems. Therefore, we shou
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 10:51:24PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andre Poenitz wrote:
Think privacy.
Now try again.
You have all this metainformation fields in a pdf file. It is rather
uninformative now then when you create a pdf file from LyX t
> Metadata repository and search possibilities like Nepomuk are coming on the
> Linux Desktop. I think it will be important that LyX files can be easily
> indexed in these new systems. Therefore, we should add metadata fields. For
in such a case, these fields should be disabled by default (or fill
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 10:51:24PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > Think privacy.
> >
> > Now try again.
>
> You have all this metainformation fields in a pdf file. It is rather
> uninformative now then when you create a pdf file from LyX the creator
> field in the p
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> Think privacy.
>
> Now try again.
>
You have all this metainformation fields in a pdf file. It is rather
uninformative now then when you create a pdf file from LyX the creator
field in the pdf file is 'TeX
Metadata repository and search possibilities like Nepomuk ar
On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 00:32 +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 10:35:06PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > * Date of creation
> > * Last modified by
> > * Last modified on the date...
> >
> > Checking in Open Office 1.1.5 (yes, it's old...), they show the following
> > prope
> * Modified (date)
> * Modified (person9
> * Last printout
> * Editing time ()
Think privacy.
Now try again.
As long as the meta information is entered by user, there is no
privacy problem. However,
1. You can use comments in preamble or even in main texts to achieve this.
2. I usually u
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 10:35:06PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> * Date of creation
> * Last modified by
> * Last modified on the date...
>
> Checking in Open Office 1.1.5 (yes, it's old...), they show the following
> properties for a MS Word document that I opened:
>
> * Created (date)
> *
I just messed with some old LyX files, and for some reason I had four
copies of the files. My problem was figuring out which file was more
recent, but unfortunately I couldn't rely on the modification time from
the file systems.
This got me thinking. Wouldn't it be good to have some of kind of
21 matches
Mail list logo
