Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This was not hard at all. The most difficult thing was to create the icons.
> OK for trunk and 1.4?
>
> Georg
Thank you very, very, VERY much!
Andreas
>>>>> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Georg> Andreas Karlsson wrote:
>> Dear list members,
>>
>> If it is not too hard, I would really appreciate if someone could
>> fix the following enhancement to LyX: In the Math Pa
On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 09:39:06AM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> This was not hard at all. The most difficult thing was to create the icons.
> OK for trunk and 1.4?
Fine with me.
Thank you.
Andre'
Andreas Karlsson wrote:
> Dear list members,
>
> If it is not too hard, I would really appreciate if someone could fix the
> following enhancement to LyX:
> In the Math Panel, under the Symbols list: Frame Decorations, I would like
> to have the possibility to use the \ove
Dear list members,
If it is not too hard, I would really appreciate if someone could fix the
following enhancement to LyX:
In the Math Panel, under the Symbols list: Frame Decorations, I would like
to have the possibility to use the \overset and \underset commands.
See: http
Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
>
>> with current cvs, the math panel with qt frontend does not show the ']'
>> symbol in the 'Delimiters' dialog. Can anybody confirm this?
>>
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
> with current cvs, the math panel with qt frontend does not show the ']'
> symbol in the 'Delimiters' dialog. Can anybody confirm this?
>
> My qt version is 2.3.1.
OK, I don't have rbracket.xpm in my t
Hi,
with current cvs, the math panel with qt frontend does not show the ']'
symbol in the 'Delimiters' dialog. Can anybody confirm this?
My qt version is 2.3.1.
Regards,
João.
On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 09:26:08PM -0200, Joao Luis Meloni Assirati wrote:
> In lyx 1.3 (both qt and xforms), when in text mode (ie, outside any math
> mode) click in the index or the exponent button in the math panel. Instead
> of opening a math environment and inserting a _ or ^, it r
In lyx 1.3 (both qt and xforms), when in text mode (ie, outside any math
mode) click in the index or the exponent button in the math panel. Instead
of opening a math environment and inserting a _ or ^, it remains in text
mode and inserts \_ or \textasciicircum{}. Is this intentional?
Joao.
2002-01-28 Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* math_support.C:
* FormMathsStyle.[Ch]:
* form_maths_style.[Ch]:
* form_maths_style.fd:
Patched to use button arrays. Buttons are self-applying, saving
one keystroke and the OK and Apply buttons.
On Friday 18 January 2002 8:27 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 04:43:28PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> > 1. The relation/negated relations subpanels are way too tall.
> >
> > 2. The size of the symbols in the .xbm's of the AMS symbols are larger
than
> > the size of the sy
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 11:50:53AM +0100, Pascal Francq wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a suggestion for the math panel. Would it be a good idea to make the
> main window of LyX activ after inserting a symbol taking from the math panel.
> For example, when I insert the square root symbol, I
Hi,
I have a suggestion for the math panel. Would it be a good idea to make the
main window of LyX activ after inserting a symbol taking from the math panel.
For example, when I insert the square root symbol, I must go with the mouse
in the LyX window to point to the good position to start
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 10:27:14PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 04:43:28PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> > 1. The relation/negated relations subpanels are way too tall.
> >
> > 2. The size of the symbols in the .xbm's of the AMS symbols are larger than
> > the size o
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 04:43:28PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> 1. The relation/negated relations subpanels are way too tall.
>
> 2. The size of the symbols in the .xbm's of the AMS symbols are larger than
> the size of the symbols in the .xbm's of the latex symbols.
> It is not too important, b
On Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 04:43:28PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> 1. The relation/negated relations subpanels are way too tall.
>
> 2. The size of the symbols in the .xbm's of the AMS symbols are larger than
> the size of the symbols in the .xbm's of the latex symbols.
> It is not too important, b
1. The relation/negated relations subpanels are way too tall.
2. The size of the symbols in the .xbm's of the AMS symbols are larger than
the size of the symbols in the .xbm's of the latex symbols.
It is not too important, but I still like to have consistency.
3. Perhaps the subpanel for latex
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Kalle Dalheimer wrote:
> On Friday, 16. March 2001 17:26, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > How do people see the math panel evolving? Is the idea to eventaully turn
> > the main math-panel into a toolbar, but to launch the individual bitmap
> > dialogs in the sa
On Friday, 16. March 2001 17:26, Angus Leeming wrote:
> How do people see the math panel evolving? Is the idea to eventaully turn
> the main math-panel into a toolbar, but to launch the individual bitmap
> dialogs in the same way as is done now?
That was exactly what we did in KLyX
How do people see the math panel evolving? Is the idea to eventaully turn the
main math-panel into a toolbar, but to launch the individual bitmap dialogs
in the same way as is done now?
Angus
21 matches
Mail list logo
