> However, I think asking all 76 people in lib/CREDITS should be ok. Not
> that I believe this is practicable...
maybe it's worthwhile to do this. 10 people probably account for 90 percent of
the code anyway. if the big contributors agree then we could easily remove
code from people who complain
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 08:15:39AM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Well, we could at least create detailed instructions on how to build the
> beast, can't we?
sure ...
> In any case, I even like the idea of providing Windows users with a working
> LyX and cause a little pain at the same time ;-}
JL> Legally I don't think we have the right to add another exception
JL> to the license, though. So I don't think we could distribute it
JL> (though it would be weird for a contributor to accept the xforms
JL> exception, as they must, but not a Qt one...)
As long as there is no reasonable Qt-relat
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 07:02:51PM +, John Levon wrote:
> He sent patches a while back.
>
> Legally I don't think we have the right to add another exception to the
> license, though.
I lean to the same side.
However, I think asking all 76 people in lib/CREDITS should be ok. Not
that I believ
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 05:51:13PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> Then we need to see he changes he did to the distribution to make this
> work. We might include some of that.
He sent patches a while back.
Legally I don't think we have the right to add another exception to the
license, thou
Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Ruurd Reitsma just emailed me that he compiled the qt version under windows
| this weekend using the qt2 windows version.
>
| Don't know what he did to get it running though.
>
| He should be putting it online somewhere tomorrow and drop an email to the
Ruurd Reitsma just emailed me that he compiled the qt version under windows
this weekend using the qt2 windows version.
Don't know what he did to get it running though.
He should be putting it online somewhere tomorrow and drop an email to the
list...
Ed.
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 03:38:17PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Angus> As I recall it, he said "contact me and I'll arrange for some
> Angus> licences"...
>
> I had something like that in mind. It would be nice first if somebody
> with access to win32 or macosx could get the grip on an eva
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Finally, we have to know whether we would have the right to distribute
> it.
I think it is possible for non-commercial apps if you distribute it under
their license.
http://www.trolltech.com/developer/licensing/qpl.html
http://www.trolltech.com/developer/licensing/n
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Don't I remember Matthias Ettrich saying something about this,
Angus> way back when? (In the course of that enormous thread a year or
Angus> so ago that was initiated by John's discovery that Matthias and
Angus> Kalle Dalheimer were
at the bottom:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=lyx-devel&m=102747986224859&w=2
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 02:15:53PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Don't I remember Matthias Ettrich saying something about this, way back when?
17 Nov 2000 plus/minus a few days.
> (In the course of that enormous thread a year or so ago that was initiated by
> John's discovery that Matthias and
On Monday 06 January 2003 11:49 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I have been looking at the possibilities of having native versions of
> lyx/qt on mac os x and win32. What are the kind of arrangements that
> trolltech can make to provide us with a free license to provide
> binaries? Are these thin
I have been looking at the possibilities of having native versions of
lyx/qt on mac os x and win32. What are the kind of arrangements that
trolltech can make to provide us with a free license to provide
binaries? Are these things supposed to `just work'? Has anybody tried
to get an evaluation lice
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 05:26:23PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Here is a patch which adds properly menu shortcuts (your patch tried
> to add some to submenus too) and adds support for the KP_foo keysyms
thanks.
> (it was S-KP_Delete which was mistaken for S_ISO_LeftTab; this shows
> btw
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
John> There are two: something is going in wrong in the queries about
John> the math menu, and something goes wrong with the code to add
John> shortcuts to the menus (leading to ISO_Left_tab instead of the
John> right one if you remember me sa
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> I have prog: qtconfig is that kde specific?
No, it seems to be qt3 specific. I have a qconfig, but I have not been
able to determine what it does :(
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Edwin" == Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 04:54:22PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>>> wrote: > - [slightly OT]: I am on a non-kde system and use qt
>>> 2.3.0. How can I > configure it to use something el
> "Edwin" == Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 04:54:22PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>> wrote: > - [slightly OT]: I am on a non-kde system and use qt
>> 2.3.0. How can I > configure it to use something else than the ugly
>> motif look?
Edwin> lyx -style wind
Edwin Leuven wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 04:54:22PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
- [slightly OT]: I am on a non-kde system and use qt 2.3.0. How can I
configure it to use something else than the ugly motif look?
lyx -style windows
For my Qt 3.06 I have motif, windows, and platinum
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 04:54:22PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > - [slightly OT]: I am on a non-kde system and use qt 2.3.0. How can I
> > configure it to use something else than the ugly motif look?
lyx -style windows
lain x11r6.x) and
> the fonts look horribly scaled. Is there a way to get unscaled
> bitmap fonts?
I certainly don't know how..
> John, can you tell me what are the pending menu code problems for the
> qt port?
There are two: something is going in wrong in the queries about the
I finally installed acompiler that allows me to run the qt port. It
looks nice...
A few remarks:
- [slightly OT]: I am on a non-kde system and use qt 2.3.0. How can I
configure it to use something else than the ugly motif look?
- If I open the document layout dialog, I get
QComboBox
23 matches
Mail list logo
