Hi,
in case I have forgotten, which is very likely, since I did not contribute
anything important ...
I hereby grant permission to license my contributions to LyX under the Gnu
General Public License, version 2 or later.
Kornel
--
Kornel Benko
kornel.be...@berlin.de
signature.asc
De
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Anyway. Angus, you may add my name to that list of yours (not the one of
> people owing you lots of beer, but that other one with poeple granting
> permission to licence their contributions to LyX under the Gnu General
> Public Licence, version 2 or later).
Great! Done so.
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 05:17:53PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | It looks like I can't really resist here, however I am not happy at all
>> | about this "or later" thing. I am interested to keep m
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 05:17:53PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | It looks like I can't really resist here, however I am not happy at all
> | about this "or later" thing. I am interested to keep my code (well, at
> | least the part related to Ly
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| It looks like I can't really resist here, however I am not happy at all
| about this "or later" thing. I am interested to keep my code (well, at
| least the part related to LyX) free and open in the spirit of the
| current GPL.
Regardless of what happes
On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 08:47:28PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> But so far IT has seen quite a couple of guys jumping from good to bad
> to in-between and the other way round (IBM, SCO, MS, ...) and there is
> no guarantee that the FSF won't sell there ideals or will be forced to
> do so to Foo
reasonable assumptions to make any progress at all.
>
> I doubt that I am the only paranoid person in this audience, so why is
> _everybody_ so eager to have this 'or later' thingy explicitly signed?
>
> Andre'
>
> PS:
>
>> Even less excitingly, beca
l there ideals or will be forced to
do so to FooBar666 Inc at some point of time which immediately will
release GPL666.
I doubt that I am the only paranoid person in this audience, so why is
_everybody_ so eager to have this 'or later' thingy explicitly signed?
Andre'
PS:
&g
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Does it matter? If the text of a permission given contains "...or
> later", doesn't that imply the same author as the implied "earlier"
> licence?
>
> ...and then there is a copyright issue (on the licence text)...
Yes, that was my point. Can "FooBar Inc" release "GPL v666
On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 06:47:25PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
...
> > the releasing. Yes, FooBar Inc could release their own rip-off of LyX
> > under GPL v666, but it wouldn't remain the mainstream version for long.
>
> Incidentally, does the FSF not own the Gnu and GPL
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-03-19 at 08:49, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 11:34:28AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> > flags them as different but I really don't care too much. I'm much
>> > more interested in getting Poenitz on board ;-)
>>
>> And I am still interested
On Sat, 2005-03-19 at 08:49, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 11:34:28AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > flags them as different but I really don't care too much. I'm much more
> > interested in getting Poenitz on board ;-)
>
> And I am still interested why I should sign not just GP
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 11:34:28AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> flags them as different but I really don't care too much. I'm much more
> interested in getting Poenitz on board ;-)
And I am still interested why I should sign not just GPL v2 (which is
just fine) but also any following version inc
chr () home ! se wrote:
>> Ronald Florence
Were you trying to tell me something about this address too?
>> Mate Wierdl
> Have you tried this address?
> mw () csi ! hu
Nope. Thanks. I'll try it.
> You'll probably need to get through some spam checking software.. IIRC,
> that meant replying to
On Mon, 7 Mar 2005, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Ronald Florence
> Mate Wierdl
Have you tried this address?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You'll probably need to get through some spam checking software.. IIRC,
that meant replying to a separate e-mail that was automatically generated.
/Chri
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> I'm much more interested in getting Poenitz on board ;-)
Indeed. And you could probably get Kornelia Pietsch at the same
time...
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Angus> The following authors are present in both lists but their email
> Angus> has changed. (blanket-permission.txt email first):
>
> Angus> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> Angus>
> Angus>
>
> Don't you have a slight problem with your scripts?
There are a
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> The following authors are present in both lists but their email
Angus> has changed. (blanket-permission.txt email first):
Angus> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Angus>
Angus>
Don't you have a slight problem with your script
I think that I've just about bottomed out in my attempt to get
people to sign blanket-permission.txt. Below is the output of a
script I've been usiing to compare the contents of CREDITS and
blanket-permission.txt. It would be nice if we could get André
to sign... I also attach the file listing the
My contributions to the code base are small but anyway:
I hereby grant permission to licence my contributions
to LyX under the Gnu General Public Licence, version 2 or later
Michael Schmitt,
Bonn, Germany
20 matches
Mail list logo
