Re: Tabular issues

2004-12-04 Thread Georg Baum
Am Freitag, 3. Dezember 2004 22:42 schrieb Rainer Dorsch: > - When I append a row in a tabular, LyX adds an additional hline, when the > cursor is in the last row (which I usually have to remove again). This is a > usability issue. Or did I miss something. If not, should I enter this as a > w

Tabular issues

2004-12-03 Thread Rainer Dorsch
Hello, I am wondering since a while about these two issues: - When I append a row in a tabular, LyX adds an additional hline, when the cursor is in the last row (which I usually have to remove again). This is a usability issue. Or did I miss something. If not, should I enter this as a wishlist

Re: Precedence parenthesis (or not) (was Re: Tabular issues)

2001-01-11 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
"Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On 9 Jan 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | | > I will remove () that has no value when I see them. | > | > - two points: | > - () without meaning kindo shows that the coder does not know the | > precedence rules | | I'm s

Re: Precedence parenthesis (or not) (was Re: Tabular issues)

2001-01-10 Thread Allan Rae
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote: > On 9 Jan 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > - () mithout meaning hides () that are really needed. > > Parenthesis are needed if the author feels they are needed. And then, they > are really needed. It's as simply as that. > > Come on,

Precedence parenthesis (or not) (was Re: Tabular issues)

2001-01-10 Thread Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
On 9 Jan 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > I will remove () that has no value when I see them. > > - two points: > - () without meaning kindo shows that the coder does not know the > precedence rules I'm sure you don't know all of them well enough to securely disambiguify any gi

Re: Tabular issues

2001-01-10 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | Lars> I think we should go for lowercase. | | I think so... Now, who will do the change if Juergen is not available? should be easy enough.. .I'll do it. Lgb

Re: Tabular issues

2001-01-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> I think we should go for lowercase. I think so... Now, who will do the change if Juergen is not available? JMarc

Re: Tabular issues

2001-01-10 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | Dekel> On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 05:07:32PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes | Dekel> wrote: | >> What about the fact that keyword are in mixed-case? Is this | >> considered good xml practice?

Re: Tabular issues

2001-01-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Dekel> On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 05:07:32PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Dekel> wrote: >> What about the fact that keyword are in mixed-case? Is this >> considered good xml practice? I seem to remember that xml is >> case-sensitive. Dekel> Sin

Re: Tabular issues

2001-01-10 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 05:07:32PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > What about the fact that keyword are in mixed-case? Is this considered > good xml practice? I seem to remember that xml is case-sensitive. Since we just changed the new tabular format, and we have two read methods for the new

Re: Tabular issues

2001-01-09 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 08:19:47PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > | > Well, then I wan tto do this: | > - bump version number to "2" | | It doesn't make sense to store the tabular format in each tabular. | The global \lyxformat suffices, s

Re: Tabular issues

2001-01-09 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 08:19:47PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj&resh;nnes wrote: > > Well, then I wan tto do this: > - bump version number to "2" It doesn't make sense to store the tabular format in each tabular. The global \lyxformat suffices, so I suggest changing the lyxformat to 2.18 and re

Re: Tabular issues

2001-01-09 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On 09-Jan-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > | > Are we compatible with pre2/3? | > | > If not that has to change. | > | > These prereleases were put forward to the general public and to change | > the format so that pre cannot be read is not accept

Re: Tabular issues

2001-01-09 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 09-Jan-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > Are we compatible with pre2/3? > > If not that has to change. > > These prereleases were put forward to the general public and to change > the format so that pre cannot be read is not acceptable. Well nice from you that you come forward now and di

Re: Tabular issues

2001-01-09 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Hi! | | I changed the tabular format for the version 1.1.6. This means your not | able anymore to read your 1.1.6 saved tabular if you don't activate the | define in tabular.C (USE_OLD_READFORMAT). If you do this you can read your | old files and write

Re: Tabular issues

2001-01-09 Thread Juergen Vigna
Hi! I changed the tabular format for the version 1.1.6. This means your not able anymore to read your 1.1.6 saved tabular if you don't activate the define in tabular.C (USE_OLD_READFORMAT). If you do this you can read your old files and write the new format. Obviously you're then not able to read

Re: Tabular issues

2001-01-09 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On 09-Jan-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > | > I will remove () that has no value when I see them. | > | | I will add () if I find expressions better to read when I need them. So that you will be able to parse the above sentence? :-) | > - two

Re: Tabular issues

2001-01-09 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 09-Jan-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > I will remove () that has no value when I see them. > I will add () if I find expressions better to read when I need them. > - two points: > - () without meaning kindo shows that the coder does not know the > precedence rules da da

Re: Tabular issues

2001-01-09 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On 09-Jan-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote: | > | > Here are the changes from the previous patch. | | Well thanks I did it already (a bit different). One thing I noticed and | I would ask you to not do it is remove my () around expressions, that is | my coding s

Re: Tabular issues

2001-01-09 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 09-Jan-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote: > > Here are the changes from the previous patch. Well thanks I did it already (a bit different). One thing I noticed and I would ask you to not do it is remove my () around expressions, that is my coding style and I like to see them where they are. Jürge

Re: Tabular issues

2001-01-09 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 12:33:39PM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote: > > On 09-Jan-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote: > > > > Here is a slightly better patch: > > getTokenValue(..., int & num) will not change num if the call to > > getTokenValue(..., tmp) returned false. > > > > I already applied the other patc

Re: Tabular issues

2001-01-09 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 09-Jan-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote: > Here is a slightly better patch: > getTokenValue(..., int & num) will not change num if the call to > getTokenValue(..., tmp) returned false. Don't bother to send a patch I already did this in a other way as I need also to translate the strings to different ty

Re: Tabular issues

2001-01-09 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 09-Jan-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote: > > Here is a slightly better patch: > getTokenValue(..., int & num) will not change num if the call to > getTokenValue(..., tmp) returned false. > I already applied the other patch :( and did already modify the source so I cannot safely apply the patch. Could

Re: Tabular issues

2001-01-09 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 11:30:31AM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote: > Well good question #:O). Is because I coded it reason enough, hmmm, dada, > I guess not ;) > > I'll apply your patch! Here is a slightly better patch: getTokenValue(..., int & num) will not change num if the call to getTokenValue(

Re: Tabular issues

2001-01-09 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 09-Jan-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote: >> There was a limitation before in this stuff and it was if the bottom line >> should be added to the row or not. So I thought that we could decide this > > So store this information using a different attribute. Yes, I've to find out (decide) how! Jürge

Re: Tabular issues

2001-01-09 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 09-Jan-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote: >> would like to have this! > > Why ? Well good question #:O). Is because I coded it reason enough, hmmm, dada, I guess not ;) I'll apply your patch! What would you say to write bools as "true"/"false" instead of "1"/"0"? Jürgen -- -._-._-._-._-._-._-

Re: Tabular issues

2001-01-09 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 09:27:30AM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote: > > What is the difference between positive and negative value ? > > > > There was a limitation before in this stuff and it was if the bottom line > should be added to the row or not. So I thought that we could decide this So store

Re: Tabular issues

2001-01-09 Thread Dekel Tsur
> > Here it is (I also fixed the first problem). > > I don't know why you didn't leave the int-reading-routine as it was. > Are you sure that strToint("123abc") == 123? Is this defined? I really No, strToint("123abc") = 0. > would like to have this! Why ?

Re: Tabular issues

2001-01-09 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 08-Jan-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote: > On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 05:15:10PM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote: >> > Also, in the new format, the numbers are negative (e.g. endfoot="-3"). Is this >> > intentional ? >> Yes it is intentional! > > What is the difference between positive and negative value ? >

Re: Tabular issues

2001-01-08 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 05:15:10PM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote: > > Also, in the new format, the numbers are negative (e.g. endfoot="-3"). Is this > > intentional ? > Yes it is intentional! What is the difference between positive and negative value ? > > - The table rotate attribute is not being

RE: Tabular issues

2001-01-08 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 08-Jan-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote: > > Both. > Also, in the new format, the numbers are negative (e.g. endfoot="-3"). Is this > intentional ? > Yes it is intentional! > What about combining and ? IMO no but if other think we should ok! > And using alignmet=center instead of alignment=8 ? >

Tabular issues

2001-01-08 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Mon, Jan 08, 2001 at 04:50:00PM +0100, Juergen Vigna wrote: > > On 08-Jan-2001 Dekel Tsur wrote: > > > - Incorrect reading of longtable options > > Now Dekel you wrote an email about this earlier, but I'm afraid it got > lost. Was the OLD-FORMAT-READ wrong or also the NEW-FORMAT-READ about >