t; > > this GCC versions (only one problems is left: there is not match_partial
> > > type in TR1)
> > > but when linking there are several unresolved essential regex functions.
> > >
> > > So only msvc10 has a complete TR1 regex impl, and we have to use boost
> > > when
> > > using GCC.
>
> :(
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43241
pavel
s is left: there is not match_partial type in TR1)
> > but when linking there are several unresolved essential regex functions.
> >
> > So only msvc10 has a complete TR1 regex impl, and we have to use boost when
> > using GCC.
:(
> OK, then. What about allowing the
> OK, then. What about allowing the rest of tr1 for all gcc 4
> implementations? We can disable some of them if problems are found.
> Pavel?
>
> I am currently removing the checktr1.h header as suggested.
Ok, I've also done the cmake changes (and removed checktr1.h).
In cmake I check for GCC >=
t; but when linking there are several unresolved essential regex functions.
>
> So only msvc10 has a complete TR1 regex impl, and we have to use boost when
> using GCC.
OK, then. What about allowing the rest of tr1 for all gcc 4
implementations? We can disable some of them if problems
essential regex functions.
So only msvc10 has a complete TR1 regex impl, and we have to use boost when
using GCC.
Peter
--
GRATIS für alle GMX-Mitglieder: Die maxdome Movie-FLAT!
Jetzt freischalten unter http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/maxdome01
