Jean-Marc LASGOUTTES wrote: > "Peter Kuemmel" <syntheti...@gmx.net> writes: > > > I've tried to replace regex with TR1's regex, and I'm really suprised about > > the missing implemnetation in GCC 4.4 and 4.5. It compiles with this GCC > > versions (only one problems is left: there is not match_partial type in TR1) > > but when linking there are several unresolved essential regex functions. > > > > So only msvc10 has a complete TR1 regex impl, and we have to use boost when > > using GCC.
:( > OK, then. What about allowing the rest of tr1 for all gcc 4 > implementations? We can disable some of them if problems are found. > Pavel? i have already proposed that we switch to tr1 for gcc. pavel