Martin Vermeer wrote:
> BTW is there a 'cvs subtract' to cancel a 'cvs add'?
No, but if you open CVS/Entries in the appropriate dir, find the file
you've added and remove that line, then who's to know ;-)
(Ie, cvs add is just a local command. No change to the repository at all.)
--
Angus
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 05:10:59PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes spake thusly:
...
> Martin> OK, so minipage must be provided at least.
>
> ... and in a way that replaces the minipage inset.
...
> The corrections for oval box seem even worse. Concerning oval box, we
> have to wonder: do we
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> OK, so minipage must be provided at least.
>> ... and in a way that replaces the minipage inset.
Martin> Eventually, why not.
I think this is something that we have to do to keep the UI coherent.
>> You want to make sure t
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 05:22:09PM +0200, Andre Poenitz spake thusly:
>
> In fact I'd think something along the lines of
>
> \usepackage{fancybox}
> \usepackage{calc}
>
> \par\fbox{\parbox{\columnwidth-2\fboxsep-2\fboxrule}{}}
> \par\ovalbox{\parbox{\columnwidth-2\fboxsep-0.8pt}{}}
>
>
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 04:13:18PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > Getting better all the time... see attached.
>
> and why are you blaming me for your code ?
> + * \author Angus Leeming
>
> --
> Angus
One day you'll be grateful ;-)
Okay, okay, ...
- M
pgp0
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 05:10:59PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes spake thusly:
>
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Could also be fixed width or 'twice the natural size of this text'
> >> (like latex2e allows) or 'make the box square'...
>
> Martin> Sure. Some e
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 05:08:16PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 02:53:54PM +0200, Andre Poenitz spake thusly:
> > What's the real world problem you are currently trying to solve?
>
> The one the (tested, working) solution of which is the following:
>
> (lyx_sty.C)
>
> s
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Getting better all the time... see attached.
and why are you blaming me for your code ?
+ * \author Angus Leeming
--
Angus
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Could also be fixed width or 'twice the natural size of this text'
>> (like latex2e allows) or 'make the box square'...
Martin> Sure. Some easy, some not so easy. But ask the UI folks first
Martin> :-)
Those are chosen to be easy e
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 04:10:42PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes spake thusly:
>
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> - set a width (which could be columnwidth)
>
> Martin> The two most popular widths will be (corrected) \columnwidth
> Martin> and "adaptive" (i.e.,
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> - set a width (which could be columnwidth)
Martin> The two most popular widths will be (corrected) \columnwidth
Martin> and "adaptive" (i.e., don't put a parbox inside the fbox). I
Martin> was considering at least having that in the
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 02:33:47PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes spake thusly:
>
> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Martin> This patch adds support for rectangular frames containing one
> Martin> or more paragraphs of text, at the width of the column, using
> Martin>
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 02:53:54PM +0200, Andre Poenitz spake thusly:
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 01:50:30PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > How about a Preamble dialog (or pane) that displayed the stuff that LyX was
> > auto-inserting too. These lines would be displayed in a different colour
> >
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 01:50:30PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> How about a Preamble dialog (or pane) that displayed the stuff that LyX was
> auto-inserting too. These lines would be displayed in a different colour
> and could not be deleted. However, if the user hit the 'Return' button
> when
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I am not sure that we will be easy to do this in a clean way. I fear
> that for some people, the thing you think should be before user
> preamble should actually be another place for their usage pattern. We
> should try to get these things as straightforward as possibl
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> On Monday 22 September 2003 12:16 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>> About the LaTeX stuff here BTW I noticed one unfortunate thing. If
>> you try to redefine fboxsep in the preamble, it ends up after the
>> fboxwidth definition... should
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> This patch adds support for rectangular frames containing one
Martin> or more paragraphs of text, at the width of the column, using
Martin> the Note infrastructure.
Why hardcoding the width?? Not everybody wants to to have boxen
On Monday 22 September 2003 12:16 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> About the LaTeX stuff here BTW I noticed one unfortunate thing. If you
> try to redefine fboxsep in the preamble, it ends up after the fboxwidth
> definition... should I make that rather a newcommand? Then it is
> called from the inset i
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Colorbox would be nice too, but I want to see first what
> Jürgen has in mind for character colours (i.e., general LaTeX colours
> support.)
Don't hold your breath, Martin. Although I have submitted my PH.D. thesis few
weeks ago, I am already snowed with real work :-(
Jue
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 12:12:46PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
>
> On Monday 22 September 2003 10:37 am, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:42:04PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
> > > Returning to nit-picking mode:
> >
> > Do I infer correctly that
> > discussion-in-p
On Monday 22 September 2003 10:37 am, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:42:04PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
> > Returning to nit-picking mode:
>
> Do I infer correctly that
> discussion-in-principle-whether-this-is-a-good-idea-at-all-mode has
> been turned off?
Support for
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:42:04PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
>
> Returning to nit-picking mode:
Do I infer correctly that
discussion-in-principle-whether-this-is-a-good-idea-at-all-mode has
been turned off?
Anyway, new version. Only the ControlBox/FormBox stuff still missing,
but should
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 08:34:25AM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
> On Monday 22 September 2003 6:26 am, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > > Question. Why doesn't InsetBoxMailer::string2params set the "type"
> >
> > It does... Hmmm. Could this be simplified? Yes! Like this
> >
> > case LFUN_INSET_M
On Monday 22 September 2003 6:26 am, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> > Question. Why doesn't InsetBoxMailer::string2params set the "type"
>
> It does... Hmmm. Could this be simplified? Yes! Like this
>
> case LFUN_INSET_MODIFY: {
> InsetNoteMailer::string2params(cmd.argument, params_);
>
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 10:42:04PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
...
> Returning to nit-picking mode:
>
> +InsetBox::InsetBox(BufferParams const & bp, string const & label)
> + : InsetCollapsable(bp)
> +{
> + params_.type = label;
> + init();
> + setButtonLabel();
>
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 10:51:21PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
>>
>> Martin Vermeer wrote:
>>
>> > This patch adds support for rectangular frames containing one or more
>> > paragraphs of text, at the width of the column, using the Note
>> > infrastructure.
>> >
>
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 04:22:09PM +0100, John Levon spake thusly:
>
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 06:36:09PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> > Okay, did just that. Here is the next attempt.
> >
> > + Menu "insert_box"
> > + Item "Boxed|B" "box-insert Boxed"
> > End
>
> Can you exp
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 06:36:09PM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Okay, did just that. Here is the next attempt.
>
> + Menu "insert_box"
> + Item "Boxed|B" "box-insert Boxed"
> End
Can you explain what further menu items are likely to end up on this
menu for me please ?
th
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 10:51:21PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
>
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> > This patch adds support for rectangular frames containing one or more
> > paragraphs of text, at the width of the column, using the Note
> > infrastructure.
> >
> > It wouldn't be too hard to ex
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 10:35:00PM +0100, John Levon spake thusly:
>
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 12:30:18AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> > + Item "[Boxed]|B" "note-insert Boxed"
>
> In my usual "trivial carping" mode - please don't. It's visually jarring
> and potentially misleading.
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 10:51:21PM +, Angus Leeming spake thusly:
>
> Martin Vermeer wrote:
>
> > This patch adds support for rectangular frames containing one or more
> > paragraphs of text, at the width of the column, using the Note
> > infrastructure.
> >
> > It wouldn't be too hard to ex
Martin Vermeer wrote:
> This patch adds support for rectangular frames containing one or more
> paragraphs of text, at the width of the column, using the Note
> infrastructure.
>
> It wouldn't be too hard to extend this to fancybox support.
>
> Does this look like the right thing to do?
What ha
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 12:30:18AM +0300, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> + Item "[Boxed]|B" "note-insert Boxed"
In my usual "trivial carping" mode - please don't. It's visually jarring
and potentially misleading.
(The "correct" way to do something like this is with gnome-style menu
icons)
This patch adds support for rectangular frames containing one or more
paragraphs of text, at the width of the column, using the Note
infrastructure.
It wouldn't be too hard to extend this to fancybox support.
Does this look like the right thing to do?
- Martin
Index: lib/ui/stdmenus.ui
34 matches
Mail list logo
