Darren Freeman wrote:
> Re-posted since this is a regression from 1.2.1 as far as my machine goes.
>
> No cause was found AFAIK. No solution, probably had something to do with
> xforms doing something bizarre.
>
> I'm using xforms 0.89 I believe, since 1.0RC5 wouldn't build for me last
> time I
Re-posted since this is a regression from 1.2.1 as far as my machine goes.
No cause was found AFAIK. No solution, probably had something to do with
xforms doing something bizarre.
I'm using xforms 0.89 I believe, since 1.0RC5 wouldn't build for me last time
I tried.
--8<--8<-
On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 22:31, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Sorry dude =)
> >
> > Keep trying!
>
> No, I'm giving up. I think that your xforms library is not behaving as it
> should. Line 225ff of slider.c:
> Since I don't see any such nonsense, I conclude that the problem is at your
> end.
OK. Wel
> Sorry dude =)
>
> Keep trying!
No, I'm giving up. I think that your xforms library is not behaving as it
should. Line 225ff of slider.c:
if (ob->align == FL_ALIGN_CENTER)
{
fl_drw_slider(ob->boxtype, sp->x, sp->y, sp->w, sp->h,
ob->col
I found that by commenting lines in FormSpellchecker.C that I couldn't
affect one label and not the other. It seems that code elsewhere is
reading the label from the form and writing it two different ways.
I don't know enough to help right now =(
Have fun,
Darren
On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 23:33, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Sunday 24 November 2002 11:27 pm, Darren Freeman wrote:
> > Still corrupted text - probably a font issue. It seems to print the
> > percentage twice, once in the desired font and again much smaller and
> > off to the right a little bit, thus th
On Fri, 2002-11-29 at 23:33, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Still corrupted text - probably a font issue. It seems to print the
> > percentage twice, once in the desired font and again much smaller and
> > off to the right a little bit, thus the small version overwrites the %
> > sign of the bigger versi
On Sunday 24 November 2002 11:27 pm, Darren Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-11-22 at 02:12, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > On Thursday 14 November 2002 3:36 pm, Darren Freeman wrote:
> > > Dear list,
> > >
> > > the spelchecker status bar is still corrupted. Attached is a screenshot
> > > at 100%. When I l
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 12:45:02PM +1030, Darren Freeman wrote:
> > It isn't a word count
>
> Then why does it say "Word count"?
Because that's a (ui) bug.
> And why does it correctly count the number of words checked when it
> reaches the end of the document?
Unrelated...
The progress bar ca
On Mon, 2002-11-25 at 10:22, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 09:57:13AM +1030, Darren Freeman wrote:
>
> > Not only that but now the word count doesn't increment. I tested with a
> > single line of jibberish, the word count stayed on 0 until all was
> > completed.
>
> It isn't a word
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 09:57:13AM +1030, Darren Freeman wrote:
> Not only that but now the word count doesn't increment. I tested with a
> single line of jibberish, the word count stayed on 0 until all was
> completed.
It isn't a word count
regards
john
--
Khendon's Law: If the same point is m
On Fri, 2002-11-22 at 02:12, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Thursday 14 November 2002 3:36 pm, Darren Freeman wrote:
> > Dear list,
> >
> > the spelchecker status bar is still corrupted. Attached is a screenshot
> > at 100%. When I looked at it glosely in GIMP I realised that the weird
> > characters ar
On Thursday 14 November 2002 3:36 pm, Darren Freeman wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> the spelchecker status bar is still corrupted. Attached is a screenshot
> at 100%. When I looked at it glosely in GIMP I realised that the weird
> characters are actually two copies of 100% on top of each other, one
> norm
Angus Leeming wrote:
On Thursday 14 November 2002 3:36 pm, Darren Freeman wrote:
Dear list,
When spellchecking, a double click of the desired suggestion replaces
the word and moves to the next possible error, as it should. But the
text in the dialogue doesn't update, it still refers to the prev
On Thursday 14 November 2002 3:36 pm, Darren Freeman wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> When spellchecking, a double click of the desired suggestion replaces
> the word and moves to the next possible error, as it should. But the
> text in the dialogue doesn't update, it still refers to the previous
> error.
Dear list,
the spelchecker status bar is still corrupted. Attached is a screenshot
at 100%. When I looked at it glosely in GIMP I realised that the weird
characters are actually two copies of 100% on top of each other, one
normal size and a second much smaller over the % sign of the first.
Hope i
16 matches
Mail list logo
