On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 09:19:42PM +1030, Beck, Andrew Thomas - BECAT001 wrote:
> People have talked about preferences for a lyx namespace and/or
> prefixes, but nobody has really explained why either is needed. IMHO,
> Lyx is never going to be a library to be linked with some other
> application
"Beck, Andrew Thomas - BECAT001" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| People have talked about preferences for a lyx namespace and/or
| prefixes, but nobody has really explained why either is needed. IMHO,
| Lyx is never going to be a library to be linked with some other
| application - it's simply not
People have talked about preferences for a lyx namespace and/or
prefixes, but nobody has really explained why either is needed. IMHO,
Lyx is never going to be a library to be linked with some other
application - it's simply not written that way. So I don't see
what it is that we need to separate
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 09:29:25AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Not sure... I see that as a limitation in Java. Nothing that we should
> absolutely try to mimic.
No, but it doesn't hurt and is really nice to grep for stuff in #include
lines and main text. And it makes editor macros for 'I a
On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 02:43:34PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Feb 2006, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > Since LyX uses svn now and svn is a bit more forgiving when it comes
> > to renaming files I thought it would be a good idea to talk a bit
> > about
On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 04:11:51PM +, John Spray wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 15:50 +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > Sometime ago we even agreed on *.C -> *.cxx change. But today to aim
> > for a what seems to be commonly used I'd use *.C -> *.cpp instead.
>
> I can't find this in the l
On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 04:16:36PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> What to do with the lyxtext/text/1/2 mess?
Text.h:
namespace lyx {
class Text {
};
}
Text.C:
// Implementation.
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| Yes, this is very convenient. File names and class names should also
| be identical (following Java conventions).
Not sure... I see that as a limitation in Java. Nothing that we should
absolutely try to mimic.
Oh well, I KNEW the answer...
Why is Java so succes
Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
| > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
| > | > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | > I have proposals coming, but I want 1.4.0 be
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
| > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
| > | > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | > I have proposals coming, but I want 1.4.0 before we do anything.
| > | > | i
Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
| > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > I have proposals coming, but I want 1.4.0 before we do anything.
| > | i.e. no {lyx,LyX,L}-prefix, instead everything in namespace lyx,
|
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> I am not really afraid of confilicts, but we should perhaps wait
Lars> with renamings until we have some of the outstanding patches
Lars> applied.
Yes please.
JMarc
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
| > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > I have proposals coming, but I want 1.4.0 before we do anything.
| > | i.e. no {lyx,LyX,L}-prefix, instead everything in namespace lyx,
| > usually one
| > | class per .h
Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| John Spray wrote:
|
| >On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 15:50 +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| >
| >>Sometime ago we even agreed on *.C -> *.cxx change. But today to aim
| >>for a what seems to be commonly used I'd use *.C -> *.cpp instead.
| >>
| >
| >I can't
John Spray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 15:50 +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > Sometime ago we even agreed on *.C -> *.cxx change. But today to aim
> > for a what seems to be commonly used I'd use *.C -> *.cpp instead.
> I can't find this in the list archive - why was i
John Spray wrote:
On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 15:50 +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Sometime ago we even agreed on *.C -> *.cxx change. But today to aim
for a what seems to be commonly used I'd use *.C -> *.cpp instead.
I can't find this in the list archive - why was it thought a good ide
Martin Vermeer a écrit :
On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 12:23:46PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
This would be 1.5.0 stuff and at least the file renamings should be done
immediately after openening 1.5.0svn for work to prevent conflicts (even
svn has no real file moves...)
Opinions?
Good idea.
What t
Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I have proposals coming, but I want 1.4.0 before we do anything.
| i.e. no {lyx,LyX,L}-prefix, instead everything in namespace lyx, usually one
| class per .h/.C combo, and files named the same way as the class.
I agree wi
On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 15:50 +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Sometime ago we even agreed on *.C -> *.cxx change. But today to aim
> for a what seems to be commonly used I'd use *.C -> *.cpp instead.
I can't find this in the list archive - why was it thought a good idea?
I personally like being
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Since LyX uses svn now and svn is a bit more forgiving when it comes
| to renaming files I thought it would be a good idea to talk a bit
| about 'source cosmetics', most notably renaming classes and files.
|
| This is no new idea, bu
On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 12:23:46PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> Since LyX uses svn now and svn is a bit more forgiving when it comes
> to renaming files I thought it would be a good idea to talk a bit
> about 'source cosmetics', most notably renaming classes and file
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Since LyX uses svn now and svn is a bit more forgiving when it comes
> to renaming files I thought it would be a good idea to talk a bit
> about 'source cosmetics', most notably renaming classes and files.
Besides being "pre
Since LyX uses svn now and svn is a bit more forgiving when it comes
to renaming files I thought it would be a good idea to talk a bit
about 'source cosmetics', most notably renaming classes and files.
This is no new idea, but I haven't seen any concrete proposals.
So here it g
23 matches
Mail list logo
