Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| John Spray wrote:
|
| >On Sun, 2006-02-26 at 15:50 +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| >
| >>Sometime ago we even agreed on *.C -> *.cxx change. But today to aim
| >>for a what seems to be commonly used I'd use *.C -> *.cpp instead.
| >>
| >
| >I can't find this in the list archive - why was it thought a good idea?
| >I personally like being able to do "foo.[Ch]".
| >
| Yes, this is very convenient. File names and class names should also
| be identical (following Java conventions).
Not sure... I see that as a limitation in Java. Nothing that we should
absolutely try to mimic.
--
Lgb
