Re: Compiling on OSX - small "patch"

2011-11-29 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 29.11.2011 um 09:40 schrieb Benjamin Piwowarski: > Hi, > > When the filesystem is case-sensitive, building LyX fails on mac: to make it > work, just change Appkit to AppKit in src/support/CMakeLists.txt >target_link_libraries(support "objc" "-framework Appkit" "-framework > CoreFoun

Re: Compiling on OSX - small "patch"

2011-11-29 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 29.11.2011 um 16:23 schrieb Kornel Benko: > Am Dienstag, 29. November 2011 um 15:38:49, schrieb Stephan Witt > >> Am 29.11.2011 um 15:32 schrieb Richard Heck: >> >>> On 11/29/2011 03:40 AM, Benjamin Piwowarski wrote: Hi, When the filesystem is case-sensitive, building LyX fai

Re: Re: Compiling on OSX - small "patch"

2011-11-29 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Dienstag, 29. November 2011 um 15:38:49, schrieb Stephan Witt > Am 29.11.2011 um 15:32 schrieb Richard Heck: > > > On 11/29/2011 03:40 AM, Benjamin Piwowarski wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> When the filesystem is case-sensitive, building LyX fails on mac: to make > >> it work, just change Appkit

Re: Compiling on OSX - small "patch"

2011-11-29 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 29.11.2011 um 15:32 schrieb Richard Heck: > On 11/29/2011 03:40 AM, Benjamin Piwowarski wrote: >> Hi, >> >> When the filesystem is case-sensitive, building LyX fails on mac: to make it >> work, just change Appkit to AppKit in src/support/CMakeLists.txt >>target_link_libraries(support

Re: Compiling on OSX - small "patch"

2011-11-29 Thread Richard Heck
On 11/29/2011 03:40 AM, Benjamin Piwowarski wrote: > Hi, > > When the filesystem is case-sensitive, building LyX fails on mac: to make it > work, just change Appkit to AppKit in src/support/CMakeLists.txt > target_link_libraries(support "objc" "-framework Appkit" "-framework > CoreFounda

Compiling on OSX - small "patch"

2011-11-29 Thread Benjamin Piwowarski
Hi, When the filesystem is case-sensitive, building LyX fails on mac: to make it work, just change Appkit to AppKit in src/support/CMakeLists.txt target_link_libraries(support "objc" "-framework Appkit" "-framework CoreFoundation") by target_link_libraries(support "objc" "-frame

Re: A small patch for "List of Algorithms"

2007-06-26 Thread Mael Hilléreau
Le 26 juin 07 à 14:51, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : "Mael" == Mael Hilléreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Mael> I attached a patch for that. It adds some definitions for Mael> '\listXXXname' and '\listofXXXs' in the preamble (with 'XXX' for Mael> every non builtin float), and generates a '\li

Re: A small patch for "List of Algorithms"

2007-06-26 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Mael" == Mael Hilléreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Mael> I attached a patch for that. It adds some definitions for Mael> '\listXXXname' and '\listofXXXs' in the preamble (with 'XXX' for Mael> every non builtin float), and generates a '\listofXXXs' in place Mael> of the '\listof{XXX}{}'. D

Re: A small patch for "List of Algorithms"

2007-06-26 Thread Mael Hilléreau
Le 25 juin 07 à 18:50, Mael Hilléreau a écrit : Le 23 juin 07 à 22:44, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Mael> I don't think so, to be translatable, the code should be Mael> something like '\listof {algorithm}{\listalgorithmname}'. I just double checked that here it outputs \listof{algorithm}{Li

Re: A small patch for "List of Algorithms"

2007-06-25 Thread Mael Hilléreau
Le 23 juin 07 à 22:44, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : > Mael> I don't think so, to be translatable, the code should be > Mael> something like '\listof {algorithm}{\listalgorithmname}'. > > I just double checked that here it outputs > \listof{algorithm}{Liste des Algorithmes} Just one last word on

Re: A small patch for "List of Algorithms"

2007-06-24 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Mael" == Mael Hilléreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Mael> Then I'm not able to figure out why it is only a Mac related Mael> issue... I let the specialist at home ;) There is some specific voodoo we are supposed to do to make this work. JMarc

Re: A small patch for "List of Algorithms"

2007-06-24 Thread Mael Hilléreau
Le 24 juin 07 à 13:09, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Mael> That's because you're using a french UI. No, because my document is in french. Ok. But I think the problem is that translation in document's language does not work on mac OS X. Maybe... Mael> I think that, even if LyX could tra

Re: A small patch for "List of Algorithms"

2007-06-24 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Mael" == Mael Hilléreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Mael> Le 23 juin 07 à 22:44, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : I don't Mael> think so, to be translatable, the code should be something like Mael> '\listof {algorithm}{\listalgorithmname}'. >> I just double checked that here it outputs >> \l

Re: A small patch for "List of Algorithms"

2007-06-24 Thread Mael Hilléreau
Le 23 juin 07 à 22:44, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : Mael> I don't think so, to be translatable, the code should be Mael> something like '\listof {algorithm}{\listalgorithmname}'. I just double checked that here it outputs \listof{algorithm}{Liste des Algorithmes} That's because you're using

Re: A small patch for "List of Algorithms"

2007-06-23 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Mael" == Mael Hilléreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Mael> Le 23 juin 07 à 17:28, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : >> As far as I know, it is supposed to output the list in the correct >> language. Mael> I don't think so, to be translatable, the code should be Mael> something like '\listof {a

Re: A small patch for "List of Algorithms"

2007-06-23 Thread Mael Hilléreau
Le 23 juin 07 à 17:28, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : As far as I know, it is supposed to output the list in the correct language. I don't think so, to be translatable, the code should be something like '\listof {algorithm}{\listalgorithmname}'. Did you install LyX before trying? I get

Re: A small patch for "List of Algorithms"

2007-06-23 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Mael" == Mael Hilléreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Mael> The "List of algorithms" label cannot be customized (translated) Mael> into the output. Mael> 1. Create a new document 2. Choose a non english language 3. Mael> Insert a list of algorithms (Insert > List / TOC > List of Mael> Algori

Re: A small patch for "List of Algorithms"

2007-06-23 Thread José Matos
On Saturday 23 June 2007 13:29:38 Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > What do we celebrate? %^} Winter/Summer Solstice. :-) > A/ -- José Abílio

Re: A small patch for "List of Algorithms"

2007-06-23 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
José Matos wrote: > On Saturday 23 June 2007 13:01:41 Mael Hilléreau wrote: >> > The attached patch solves the problem. Please tell me if it's >> > sufficient as I'm note sure if things are done in the right way... >> >> No feedback on this? > > We are on a weekend with celebrations going aroun

Re: A small patch for "List of Algorithms"

2007-06-23 Thread José Matos
On Saturday 23 June 2007 13:01:41 Mael Hilléreau wrote: > > The attached patch solves the problem. Please tell me if it's   > > sufficient as I'm note sure if things are done in the right way... > > No feedback on this? We are on a weekend with celebrations going around so please be patient. :-)

Re: A small patch for "List of Algorithms"

2007-06-23 Thread Mael Hilléreau
Le 22 juin 07 à 19:21, Mael Hilléreau a écrit : The "List of algorithms" label cannot be customized (translated) into the output. 1. Create a new document 2. Choose a non english language 3. Insert a list of algorithms (Insert > List / TOC > List of Algorithms) 4. View the source (View > V

Re: A small patch for "List of Algorithms"

2007-06-22 Thread Mael Hilléreau
Le 22 juin 07 à 22:44, Alfredo Braunstein a écrit : Mael Hilléreau wrote: I apologize, I sent this mail twice. I had some problems with my SMTP server... No need to apologize. The list is terribly slow today, some messages had a delay of more than an hour. Ok, happy to know that it's no

Re: A small patch for "List of Algorithms"

2007-06-22 Thread Alfredo Braunstein
Mael Hilléreau wrote: > I apologize, I sent this mail twice. I had some problems with my SMTP > server... No need to apologize. The list is terribly slow today, some messages had a delay of more than an hour. A/

Re: A small patch for "List of Algorithms"

2007-06-22 Thread Mael Hilléreau
I apologize, I sent this mail twice. I had some problems with my SMTP server... Le 22 juin 07 à 20:48, Mael Hilléreau a écrit : The "List of algorithms" label cannot be customized (translated) into the output. 1. Create a new document 2. Choose a non english language 3. Insert a list of al

A small patch for "List of Algorithms"

2007-06-22 Thread Mael Hilléreau
The "List of algorithms" label cannot be customized (translated) into the output. 1. Create a new document 2. Choose a non english language 3. Insert a list of algorithms (Insert > List / TOC > List of Algorithms) 4. View the source (View > View Source) The code corresponding to the "List of Algo

A small patch for "List of Algorithms"

2007-06-22 Thread Mael Hilléreau
The "List of algorithms" label cannot be customized (translated) into the output. 1. Create a new document 2. Choose a non english language 3. Insert a list of algorithms (Insert > List / TOC > List of Algorithms) 4. View the source (View > View Source) The code corresponding to the "List o

A small patch for "List of Algorithms"

2007-06-22 Thread Mael Hilléreau
The "List of algorithms" label cannot be customized (translated) into the output. 1. Create a new document 2. Choose a non english language 3. Insert a list of algorithms (Insert > List / TOC > List of Algorithms) 4. View the source (View > View Source) The code corresponding to the "List o

Re: Small patch to keep the paranoid happy

2007-02-04 Thread Bo Peng
On 2/5/07, Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think that INSTALL.Win32 should state that Microsoft is happy to have msvcp80.dll and msvcr80.dll distributed with the LyX installer. See attached, which I'd recommend be committed. Looks reasonable. Applied. Bo

Small patch to keep the paranoid happy

2007-02-04 Thread Angus Leeming
I think that INSTALL.Win32 should state that Microsoft is happy to have msvcp80.dll and msvcr80.dll distributed with the LyX installer. See attached, which I'd recommend be committed. -- AngusIndex: INSTALL.Win32 === --- INSTALL.Win3

Re: A small patch to Literate.lyx

2002-03-13 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Kayvan" == Kayvan A Sylvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Kayvan> Hi folks, This is a small Literate.lyx patch. I am still Kayvan> thinking about the best way to solve Bug #190 ( Kayvan> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=190 ) and so needed to Kayvan> look at Literate.lyx, which is when

A small patch to Literate.lyx

2002-03-12 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
Hi folks, This is a small Literate.lyx patch. I am still thinking about the best way to solve Bug #190 ( http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=190 ) and so needed to look at Literate.lyx, which is when I came across this problem. -- Kayvan A. Sylvan | Proud husband of | Father

Re: another 1.2.0 test [small PATCH]

2001-12-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Juergen> Ehm... I think that the settings for "footnote" fontsize in Juergen> preferences are not the size of the footnote text on screen, Juergen> but the (screen) size of text which has \footnotesize. It should also be the fon

Re: another 1.2.0 test [small PATCH]

2001-12-09 Thread Allan Rae
On Sat, 8 Dec 2001, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Ehm... I think that the settings for "footnote" fontsize in preferences > are not the size of the footnote text on screen, but the (screen) size > of text which has \footnotesize. > > Confusing is that some of the sizes in the character dialog and

Re: another 1.2.0 test [small PATCH]

2001-12-08 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Herbert Voss wrote: > sure, but in 1.1.6 it was also the fontsize for the footnotetext > > or am I wrong??? I think you're wrong. AFAICS from a quick test with 1.1.6, the footnote symbol (the red "foot" of the collapsable inset) changes if you change \footnotesize-display, but not the footnotet

Re: another 1.2.0 test [small PATCH]

2001-12-08 Thread Herbert Voss
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Herbert Voss wrote: > >>can somebody confirm? >> >>a different fontsize for footnotes in the preferences has no >>effect. the footnotetext has the same fontsize than the maintext. >> > > Ehm... I think that the settings for "footnote" fontsize in preferences > are

Re: another 1.2.0 test [small PATCH]

2001-12-08 Thread Juergen Spitzmueller
Herbert Voss wrote: > can somebody confirm? > > a different fontsize for footnotes in the preferences has no > effect. the footnotetext has the same fontsize than the maintext. Ehm... I think that the settings for "footnote" fontsize in preferences are not the size of the footnote text on screen

[rebollo@pc90.iaf.cnrs-gif.fr: Re: Small patch for latin9]

2001-10-04 Thread adrien . rebollo
On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 12:23:51PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "adrien" == adrien rebollo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > adrien> Thanks for having it applied. I have noticed there are three > adrien> characters which do not need that protection : degree, > adrien> masculine and fe

Re: Small patch for latin9

2001-09-30 Thread adrien . rebollo
On Thu, Sep 27, 2001 at 11:29:10AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >>>>> "adrien" == adrien rebollo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > adrien> Hello, Here is a small patch to ensure some math-specific > adrien> characters are treated in latin9

Small patch for latin9

2001-09-24 Thread adrien . rebollo
Hello, Here is a small patch to ensure some math-specific characters are treated in latin9 as well as in latin1. It solves one of the problems I have with this encoding. But there are many others. The most important appears when I select iso8859-15 as the screen font encoding. Instead of

Re: small patch (perhaps) + questions

2001-03-22 Thread Edwin Leuven
> Fantastic!!! Somebody else using the controllers! Welcome aboard! Glad you liked the brochure. Hope you will like the trip. ;-) Ed.

Re: small patch (perhaps) + questions

2001-03-22 Thread Angus Leeming
> Angus, I hope to have some time soon to help along with this quest to MVCise > the rest of the dialogs. Can you possibly tell the mailing list when you start > working on a dialog so any work doesn't clash ? ;-) Sure. Since last commit FormError is done and FormInclude is being done. This me

Re: small patch (perhaps) + questions

2001-03-22 Thread John Levon
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Angus Leeming wrote: > On Thursday 22 March 2001 14:43, Edwin Leuven wrote: > > I will do the following: > > > > 1. > > > > frontends/xforms/FormSpell.[Ch] > > frontends/xforms/form_spell.[Ch] > > frontends/xforms/forms/form_spell.fd > > > > 2. > > > > frontends/controll

Re: small patch (perhaps) + questions

2001-03-22 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 22-Mar-2001 Edwin Leuven wrote: > Do you agree? I do! Jürgen -- -._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._ Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Italienallee 13/N Tel/Fax: +39-0471-450260 / +39-0471-450253 I-39100 Bozen Web:

Re: small patch (perhaps) + questions

2001-03-22 Thread Angus Leeming
On Thursday 22 March 2001 14:43, Edwin Leuven wrote: > I will do the following: > > 1. > > frontends/xforms/FormSpell.[Ch] > frontends/xforms/form_spell.[Ch] > frontends/xforms/forms/form_spell.fd > > 2. > > frontends/controllers/ControlSpell.[Ch] > > where the controller uses the present sp

Re: small patch (perhaps) + questions

2001-03-22 Thread Edwin Leuven
> I had a look at the patch! I thought it was a GUII patch but what you did > is just moving some functions around! IMO this is not good it just makes > spellchecker.C more complicated. If you want to remove those functions > from BufferView, then IMO it's better to move them inside a new file > (

RE: small patch (perhaps) + questions

2001-03-22 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 21-Mar-2001 Edwin Leuven wrote: > Hi All, > Hi Edwin! > As a first hesitant step towards cleaning up the spellcheck code (and move it > to frontends) this patch moves some functions out of BufferView into the > spellcheck code. It's perhaps not very pretty but I don't see why we have I

Re: small patch (perhaps) + questions

2001-03-22 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 22-Mar-2001 Edwin Leuven wrote: > Please tell me if these questions are too ignorant and stupid to merit a > reply: No they aren't but I didn't have time yesterday to have a look at your patch. I hopefully have time today and then I'll answer you (as much as I can/and know ;) Jürgen

Re: small patch (perhaps) + questions

2001-03-22 Thread Andre Poenitz
> Please tell me if these questions are too ignorant and stupid to merit a > reply: Not really, I'd just expected other people to take care of it since it is not my ballpark. Anyway: > > As a first hesitant step towards cleaning up the spellcheck code (and move > > it to frontends) this patch m

Re: small patch (perhaps) + questions

2001-03-22 Thread Edwin Leuven
Please tell me if these questions are too ignorant and stupid to merit a reply: > As a first hesitant step towards cleaning up the spellcheck code (and move > it to frontends) this patch moves some functions out of BufferView into the > spellcheck code. It's perhaps not very pretty but I don't s

Re: small patch (perhaps) + questions

2001-03-21 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | I also noticed the new member Last() in LyXParagraph. As far as I can see | Last() is now called where before size() was called. So my question: why add | a new member Last() instead of #ifndef'fing size()? The opposite is true. Last() is beeing remov

small patch (perhaps) + questions

2001-03-21 Thread Edwin Leuven
Hi All, As a first hesitant step towards cleaning up the spellcheck code (and move it to frontends) this patch moves some functions out of BufferView into the spellcheck code. It's perhaps not very pretty but I don't see why we have these very specialized functions that are called only once an

RE: Small patch

2001-02-19 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 19-Feb-2001 Angus Leeming wrote: > could someone please apply this patch --- I don't think I have write > permissions to all relevant directories. I'll apply it! Jürgen -- -._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._ Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL PRO

Small patch

2001-02-19 Thread Angus Leeming
could someone please apply this patch --- I don't think I have write permissions to all relevant directories. Angus patch.diff.gz

small patch to FormPrint

2001-01-10 Thread Angus Leeming
Adds a Browse button, so that user can choose file to print to more easily. A patch.diff.bz2

Small patch

2000-11-16 Thread Andre Poenitz
... for mathed under http://mathematik.htwm.de/tmp/mathed.diff It basically replaces some (byte *, int) pairs by string and removes the necessity for 11 reinterpret_cast<>. It does not change any functionality and is as small as possible (and thus only a first step). Andre' -- André Pö

Re: Small patch for kbsequence.[Ch]

2000-11-15 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | ... under http://mathematik.htwm.de/tmp/kbmap.diff | | It only replaces this home made storages scheme for 'sequence' and | 'modifiers' with std::vector. | | Next step should be replacing this 'if length is negative' hack... I decided to include th

Re: Small patch for kbsequence.[Ch]

2000-11-03 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > Only one bad: is not a valied type is. | | is this another C/C++ incompatibility ? | | just out of interest No, not anymore in C99 implicit types are disallowed just as in C++. Lgb

Re: Small patch for kbsequence.[Ch]

2000-11-03 Thread John Levon
On 3 Nov 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | ... under http://mathematik.htwm.de/tmp/kbmap.diff > | > | It only replaces this home made storages scheme for 'sequence' and > | 'modifiers' with std::vector. > > I like it a lot. This will be the fi

Re: Small patch for kbsequence.[Ch]

2000-11-03 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | ... under http://mathematik.htwm.de/tmp/kbmap.diff | | It only replaces this home made storages scheme for 'sequence' and | 'modifiers' with std::vector. I like it a lot. This will be the first thing to happen after 1.1.6 is released. Only one bad:

Small patch for kbsequence.[Ch]

2000-11-02 Thread Andre Poenitz
... under http://mathematik.htwm.de/tmp/kbmap.diff It only replaces this home made storages scheme for 'sequence' and 'modifiers' with std::vector. Next step should be replacing this 'if length is negative' hack... Andre' -- André Pönitz [EMAIL PROT

RE: small patch to kde frontend

2000-09-19 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 19-Sep-2000 Angus Leeming wrote: > The small patch attached to this mail enables error and warning free > compilation of the kde frontend using DEC cxx. Patch made against today's > (19Sep) CVS. Applied!

small patch to kde frontend

2000-09-19 Thread Angus Leeming
The small patch attached to this mail enables error and warning free compilation of the kde frontend using DEC cxx. Patch made against today's (19Sep) CVS. Angus Index: ChangeLog === RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-

Re: Literate programming -- Small patch to catch new noweb error

2000-07-13 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 13-Jul-2000 Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote: > > I've reviewed this patch and I think it should go in (I applied it to my > local source tree and tested it). Applied! Jürgen -- -._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._ Dr. Jürgen VignaE-Mail: [EMAIL PROTE

Re: Literate programming -- Small patch to catch new noweb error

2000-07-12 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
On Thu, Jul 13, 2000 at 12:42:35AM +0100, Bernard Michael Hurley wrote: > Hi all, > > I have found a noweb error that is not caught by the current listerrors > program: >unescaped << in documentation chunk Ah!!! At last!! This one has bugged me many times before... Thanks for fixing it.

Literate programming -- Small patch to catch new noweb error

2000-07-12 Thread Bernard Michael Hurley
Hi all, I have found a noweb error that is not caught by the current listerrors program: unescaped << in documentation chunk I have changed Literate.lyx to catch this. To cause the error take any Literate program and put a space before the first "<<" in a scrap. If you LaTeX the file t

small patch

2000-07-11 Thread Angus Leeming
Attached is a small patch to tidy up some inset code. I have re-implemented an Edit() method in InsetCitation, having seen how things were done in InsetTOC etc. 2000-07-11 Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * src/insets/insetcite.[Ch] (Edit): new method. Commensurate tidy

RE: small patch 2

2000-07-11 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 10-Jul-2000 Angus Leeming wrote: > I reported this DEC cxx warning a few days ago. It seems that the consensus was > that Inset::deleteLyXText should be a const function, but the code hasn't been > updated. If it makes life easier, here is the patch. Could someone > apply it, please. > Thank

Re: small patch

2000-07-10 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
the include that that this pragma works on. | Here | then is a small patch to src/insets/insetcite.C (I can't see the point of the | #include config.h, but maybe it should be replaced rather than | deleted.) This patch is bad, and will not make any difference. (except the possiblity of stran

small patch 2

2000-07-10 Thread Angus Leeming
I reported this DEC cxx warning a few days ago. It seems that the consensus was that Inset::deleteLyXText should be a const function, but the code hasn't been updated. If it makes life easier, here is the patch. Could someone apply it, please. Angus cxx: Warning: ../../src/insets/insettext.h, li

small patch

2000-07-10 Thread Angus Leeming
I've just returned from a few days in Andalucia to find masses and masses of LyX mail in my in tray. Such a busy project! Anyway, having read it all, I note that Lars says that #pragma definitions should come before #include s. Here then is a small patch to src/insets/insetcite.C (I can'

Re: small patch

2000-06-21 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
"Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | "Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen" wrote: | > | > > Here's a small patch to external_templates, which I think will save many | > > trips to the man hole. | > | > Garst, thank you for reading the f

Re: small patch

2000-06-20 Thread Garst R. Reese
"Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen" wrote: > > > Here's a small patch to external_templates, which I think will save many > > trips to the man hole. > > Garst, thank you for reading the fig2dev man page for me. > I would appreciate it if somebody applied this patc

Re: small patch

2000-06-20 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 20-Jun-2000 Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote: >> Here's a small patch to external_templates, which I think will save many >> trips to the man hole. > > Garst, thank you for reading the fig2dev man page for me. > I would appreciate it if somebody applied this pa

Re: small patch

2000-06-20 Thread Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
> Here's a small patch to external_templates, which I think will save many > trips to the man hole. Garst, thank you for reading the fig2dev man page for me. I would appreciate it if somebody applied this patch. Thanks, Asger

small patch

2000-06-19 Thread Garst R. Reese
Here's a small patch to external_templates, which I think will save many trips to the man hole. Garst external_templates.diff.gz

Re: Small patch

2000-05-12 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Dekel> I've taken a look at various documentclasses, and when I looked Dekel> at hollywood.layout, I got annoyed by the fact that the Dekel> Parenthetical layout only draws ( and not ). So I quickly Dekel> created a patch that fixes it (I've

Re: Small patch

2000-05-12 Thread Garst R. Reese
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > "Garst" == Garst R Reese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Garst> I do hope that the ability to edit labels does not get lost. > > No, but since the patch contains other stuff we are waiting a bit to > apply it. At least this feature should definitely go in.

Re: Small patch

2000-05-12 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Garst" == Garst R Reese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Garst> I do hope that the ability to edit labels does not get lost. No, but since the patch contains other stuff we are waiting a bit to apply it. At least this feature should definitely go in. JMarc

Re: Small patch

2000-05-11 Thread Garst R. Reese
Dekel Tsur wrote: > > I've taken a look at various documentclasses, and when I looked at > hollywood.layout, I got annoyed by the fact that the Parenthetical layout > only draws ( and not ). So I quickly created a patch that fixes it (I've > already done most of the work when I added support for

Re: Small patch

2000-05-11 Thread Garst R. Reese
Dekel Tsur wrote: > > I've taken a look at various documentclasses, and when I looked at > hollywood.layout, I got annoyed by the fact that the Parenthetical layout > only draws ( and not ). So I quickly created a patch that fixes it (I've > already done most of the work when I added support for

Small patch

2000-05-11 Thread Dekel Tsur
I've taken a look at various documentclasses, and when I looked at hollywood.layout, I got annoyed by the fact that the Parenthetical layout only draws ( and not ). So I quickly created a patch that fixes it (I've already done most of the work when I added support for end-of-proof box). The patch

Re: small patch

2000-03-30 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> | Index: lib/reLyX/Makefile.am | >> === >> | RCS file: >> /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/lib/reLyX/Makefile.am,v | >> retrieving revision 1.4 | diff -p -u -r1.4 Makefile

Re: small patch

2000-03-30 Thread Angus Leeming
> | Index: lib/reLyX/Makefile.am > | === > | RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/lib/reLyX/Makefile.am,v > | retrieving revision 1.4 > | diff -p -u -r1.4 Makefile.am > | --- lib/reLyX/Makefile.am 2000/03/27 15:34:41 1.4 >

Re: small patch

2000-03-30 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Index: lib/reLyX/Makefile.am | === | RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/lib/reLyX/Makefile.am,v | retrieving revision 1.4 | diff -p -u -r1.4 Makefile.am | --- lib/reLyX/Makefile.am

small patch

2000-03-30 Thread Angus Leeming
Current CVS won't install reLyX because variable DESTDIR is not defined. The following small and dirty fix works, but someone out there must know a better way. Note also, make install in lib/reLyX does not call libinstalldirs: or install-data-local:, so they aren't needed. Angus Index: lib/reLy

Re: A small patch

2000-03-20 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Juergen" == Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Juergen> On 20-Mar-2000 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >>> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Dekel> This patch adds the option to store all backup files in a Dekel> single directory. >> Thanks. I applied it. >> Ju

Re: A small patch

2000-03-20 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 20-Mar-2000 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Dekel> This patch adds the > Dekel> option to store all backup files in a single directory. > > Thanks. I applied it. > If this works it's a great patch I wanted something like this for a l

Re: A small patch

2000-03-20 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Dekel> This patch adds the Dekel> option to store all backup files in a single directory. Thanks. I applied it. JMarc

A small patch

2000-03-18 Thread Dekel Tsur
This patch adds the option to store all backup files in a single directory. patch.gz

Small patch for figinset

2000-03-10 Thread Andre Poenitz
I attach a small patch to insets/figinset.C. It just uses std::vector instead of Figref** and similar std::vector instead of figdata** and removes about 70 lines of 'not so C++ish' code. Andre' snip - Index: src/in

Re: Small patch for warning free compiles under egcs-1.1.2

2000-03-01 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> This has been irritating me for ages, so I finally sorted it Angus> out! Results in warning-free compiles with egcs-1.1.2 when the Angus> X header files have no return type defined. You changes seem reasonable, so I'll include the

Small patch for warning free compiles under egcs-1.1.2

2000-03-01 Thread Angus Leeming
This has been irritating me for ages, so I finally sorted it out! Results in warning-free compiles with egcs-1.1.2 when the X header files have no return type defined. best wishes, Angus *** acinclude.m4Wed Mar 01 13:30:52 2000 --- acinclude_new.m4Wed Mar 01 13:29:41 2000 ***