On Wednesday 27 November 2002 3:17 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 04:03:03PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >> "There is no such thing as a valid naked pointer."
> |
> | Tell the people who implement boost:: or std::vector
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 04:03:03PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> "There is no such thing as a valid naked pointer."
>
| Tell the people who implement boost:: or std::vector<>.
>
| Anyway, I think it's that time of the year again when it's better t
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wednesday 27 November 2002 3:03 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> You already did, you forgot to initialize it.
>> (and we have done that mistake in a lot of other places as well earlier)
>
| I can write invalid code with boost::smart_ptrs too you kno
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 04:03:03PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> "There is no such thing as a valid naked pointer."
Tell the people who implement boost:: or std::vector<>.
Anyway, I think it's that time of the year again when it's better to leave
lyx-devel alone.
Things are broken by arbit
On Wednesday 27 November 2002 3:03 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> You already did, you forgot to initialize it.
> (and we have done that mistake in a lot of other places as well earlier)
I can write invalid code with boost::smart_ptrs too you know.
> | I would say that this is a
> | perfectly v
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 02:58:57PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> There's no need to make things complicated just for the sake of making things
>> complicated. There has to be a real reason too...
>
| But making things complicated ranks high as a real r
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wednesday 27 November 2002 2:48 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> But do we like all these bald pointers?
>>
>> void ControlMath::showDaughter(void * key)
>> {
>> Store::iterator it = daughters_.find(key);
>> weak_ptr new_active =
>>
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 02:58:57PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> There's no need to make things complicated just for the sake of making things
> complicated. There has to be a real reason too...
But making things complicated ranks high as a real reason...
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up
On Wednesday 27 November 2002 2:48 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> But do we like all these bald pointers?
>
> void ControlMath::showDaughter(void * key)
> {
> Store::iterator it = daughters_.find(key);
> weak_ptr new_active =
> (it == daughters_.end()) ? 0 : it->second;
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wednesday 27 November 2002 12:43 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> | On Wednesday 27 November 2002 3:17 am, John Levon wrote:
>> | > but I can reproduce your math crash
>> |
>> | Which also has a silly caus
On Wednesday 27 November 2002 12:43 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | On Wednesday 27 November 2002 3:17 am, John Levon wrote:
> | > but I can reproduce your math crash
> |
> | Which also has a silly cause (although I can't reproduce it.) Bet it's
> | fi
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wednesday 27 November 2002 3:17 am, John Levon wrote:
| > but I can reproduce your math crash
|
| Which also has a silly cause (although I can't reproduce it.) Bet it's fixed
| by this though:
|
| ControlMath::ControlMath(LyXView & lv, Dialogs & d
On Wednesday 27 November 2002 3:17 am, John Levon wrote:
> but I can reproduce your math crash
Which also has a silly cause (although I can't reproduce it.) Bet it's fixed
by this though:
ControlMath::ControlMath(LyXView & lv, Dialogs & d)
- : ControlDialogBD(lv, d)
+ : ControlDialo
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 12:28:20PM +1030, Darren Freeman wrote:
> the segfault on file->new file->save just went away as of the last
that was a silly
but I can reproduce your math crash
john
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 21:40, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 November 2002 10:59 am, Darren Freeman wrote:
> > Dear list,
> >
> > Open the math panel.
> >
> > Click a button.
> >
> > *BOOM*
> >
> > segfault
>
> I do not see this at all, so it's going to be hard to fix your problem unless
> y
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 09:29:33PM +1030, Darren Freeman wrote:
> Wassup wit all these segfaults in the CVS as of about yesterday???
seems the boost update screwed us over
> Never before has an editor segfaulted and left me get back in just
> seconds to the exact character I was editing =)
The
On Tuesday 26 November 2002 10:59 am, Darren Freeman wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> Open the math panel.
>
> Click a button.
>
> *BOOM*
>
> segfault
I do not see this at all, so it's going to be hard to fix your problem unless
you supply something useful like a backtrace
gdb lyx
gdb> bt
gdb> up
> Was
Dear list,
Open the math panel.
Click a button.
*BOOM*
segfault
Wassup wit all these segfaults in the CVS as of about yesterday???
I've said it before and I'll say it again. Autosave in LyX ROCKS!!!
Never before has an editor segfaulted and left me get back in just
seconds to the exact charac
18 matches
Mail list logo
