Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wednesday 27 November 2002 3:03 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> You already did, you forgot to initialize it.
>> (and we have done that mistake in a lot of other places as well earlier)
>
| I can write invalid code with boost::smart_ptrs too you know.
>
>> | I would say that this is a
>> | perfectly valid use of a naked pointer.
>>
>> "There is no such thing as a valid naked pointer."
>
| Oh, bollocks! What do you think the smart_ptrs wrap? Yes, that's right, a
| /private/ naked pointer.
:-)
But that is library code, not application code.
--
Lgb
