On Tuesday 26 June 2007 17:11:26 Stefan Schimanski wrote:
>
> Fixed in r18741.
> Fixed in r18774.
> Fixed in 18742.
> Fixed in 18737.
>
> Stefan
OK. Nice to know. :-)
--
José Abílio
Am 26.06.2007 um 16:18 schrieb José Matos:
On Sunday 10 June 2007 16:17:48 Stefan Schimanski wrote:
I have posted several patches which are waiting to go in or a comment
why not:
* [patch] sometimes only paragraph of cursor is visible, #3231
Fixed in r18741.
* [patch] Up/down cursor in ma
On Sunday 10 June 2007 16:17:48 Stefan Schimanski wrote:
> I have posted several patches which are waiting to go in or a comment
> why not:
>
> * [patch] sometimes only paragraph of cursor is visible, #3231
> * [patch] Up/down cursor in math-macro jumps out of the macro, #3830
> * [patch] fixing
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
- What are the patches submitted that you think deserve attention?
I would like to give special attention to critical bugs and so on...
I have posted several patches which are waiting to go in or a comment
why not:
* [patch] sometimes only paragraph of cursor
CursorSlice & CursorSlice::operator=(CursorSlice const & cs)
{
inset_ = cs.inset_;
idx_ = cs.idx_;
pit_ = cs.pit_;
pos_ = cs.pos_;
- if (inset_ && inset_->destroyedSignal()) {
- inset_connection_ = inset_->destroyedSignal()->connect(
-
On Sat, Jun 09, 2007 at 12:49:09PM +0200, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
> It works fine (as far as I can judge after 2 minutes testing). I
> added some comments and pulled apart the loop to make the control
> flow easier. Alfredo, can you check please? I would be happy if we
> could get rid of the
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 10:40:45PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, José Matos wrote:
>
> >On Friday 08 June 2007 16:59:35 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>In Sweden, June 22nd would be a bad choice because it's a big holiday -
> >>everybody is off. I'll be in the archipelago for
- What are the patches submitted that you think deserve attention?
I would like to give special attention to critical bugs and so on...
I have posted several patches which are waiting to go in or a comment
why not:
* [patch] sometimes only paragraph of cursor is visible, #323
Am 09.06.2007 um 15:05 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Am 09.06.2007 um 14:46 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Ok, committed. So let's see if everything is alright now. We
still have some days to the RC2 for testing.
If the testing reveals that we do
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Am 09.06.2007 um 14:46 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Ok, committed. So let's see if everything is alright now. We still
have some days to the RC2 for testing.
If the testing reveals that we don't need the Inset::destroyed()
signal, this should
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Am 09.06.2007 um 14:46 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Ok, committed. So let's see if everything is alright now. We still
have some days to the RC2 for testing.
If the testing reveals that we don't need the Inset::destroyed()
signal, this should
Am 09.06.2007 um 14:46 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Ok, committed. So let's see if everything is alright now. We still
have some days to the RC2 for testing.
If the testing reveals that we don't need the Inset::destroyed()
signal, this should be deleted before RC2 t
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Ok, committed. So let's see if everything is alright now. We still have
some days to the RC2 for testing.
If the testing reveals that we don't need the Inset::destroyed() signal,
this should be deleted before RC2 too.
Abdel.
Ok, committed. So let's see if everything is alright now. We still
have some days to the RC2 for testing.
Stefan
Am 09.06.2007 um 14:32 schrieb Alfredo Braunstein:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
It works fine (as far as I can judge after 2 minutes testing). I
added
som
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Stefan Schimanski wrote:
>> It works fine (as far as I can judge after 2 minutes testing). I added
>> some comments and pulled apart the loop to make the control flow easier.
>> Alfredo, can you check please? I would be happy if we could get rid of
>> the signals finally
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
It works fine (as far as I can judge after 2 minutes testing). I added
some comments and pulled apart the loop to make the control flow easier.
Alfredo, can you check please? I would be happy if we could get rid of
the signals finally like this.
I am not Alfredo but i
Am 09.06.2007 um 13:09 schrieb Alfredo Braunstein:
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
It works fine (as far as I can judge after 2 minutes testing). I
added some comments and pulled apart the loop to make the control
flow easier. Alfredo, can you check please? I would be happy if we
could get rid of th
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
> It works fine (as far as I can judge after 2 minutes testing). I
> added some comments and pulled apart the loop to make the control
> flow easier. Alfredo, can you check please? I would be happy if we
> could get rid of the signals finally like this.
Sure, but I cannot
It works fine (as far as I can judge after 2 minutes testing). I
added some comments and pulled apart the loop to make the control
flow easier. Alfredo, can you check please? I would be happy if we
could get rid of the signals finally like this.
Stefan
Index: lyx-devel/src/CursorSlice.cpp
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
>>> Some small questions:
>>> Why don't you like comments?
>>
>> ? Be more specific. OTOH, I would have like some comment of yours
>> when I
>> asked for them a week ago... ;-)
>
> Sorry, meant something like two lines describing what the big loop is
> doing. Not the comm
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
> I guess yes. Compiling right now. If it does, that would be great.
> Signals in those CursorSlices, always feel in a strange way when
> thinking about it :)
Since you are at it, could you please just commit if you think it is correct?
Jürgen
Some small questions:
Why don't you like comments?
? Be more specific. OTOH, I would have like some comment of yours
when I
asked for them a week ago... ;-)
Sorry, meant something like two lines describing what the big loop is
doing. Not the comments here :)
Why do you need this compli
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
> Some small questions:
> Why don't you like comments?
? Be more specific. OTOH, I would have like some comment of yours when I
asked for them a week ago... ;-)
> Why do you need this complicated logic to set the inset to 0 in many
> cases. Won't that end the loop anyway
Am 09.06.2007 um 00:28 schrieb Alfredo Braunstein:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Yes, the patch looks good, except that the messages are not very
informative (but as a usr I would be scared to see all these messages
in normal operation). And there is a very long line.
Fixed. Note that the sca
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Yes, the patch looks good, except that the messages are not very
> informative (but as a usr I would be scared to see all these messages
> in normal operation). And there is a very long line.
Fixed. Note that the scary messages are already there in svn.
Please apply
On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, José Matos wrote:
On Friday 08 June 2007 16:59:35 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In Sweden, June 22nd would be a bad choice because it's a big holiday -
everybody is off. I'll be in the archipelago for instance. I'm guessing
Martin might be off as well?
What is the problem? If
> "Alfredo" == Alfredo Braunstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alfredo> José Matos wrote:
>> - What are the patches submitted that you think deserve attention?
>> I would like to give special attention to critical bugs and so
>> on...
Alfredo> This fixes a crash with multiple views...
Alfredo
On Friday 08 June 2007 16:59:35 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In Sweden, June 22nd would be a bad choice because it's a big holiday -
> everybody is off. I'll be in the archipelago for instance. I'm guessing
> Martin might be off as well?
What is the problem? If you have one more reason to celebrat
On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, José Matos wrote:
in the release of rc1. The new schedule can be found in the usual place:
http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/ReleaseSchedule
(Executive summary: rc2 - 15 June; final - 22 June)
In Sweden, June 22nd would be a bad choice because it's a big holiday -
everybody is off
On Fri, 8 Jun 2007, Bo Peng wrote:
Christian and I have to fix the dictionary downloading problem of the
windows installer before RC2.
I agree. My problem is a lack of a Windows machine at home, but I think I
can work on it during next week.
Has anyone heard from Joost in a while?
/Christi
José Matos wrote:
> - What are the patches submitted that you think deserve attention?
> I would like to give special attention to critical bugs and so on...
This fixes a crash with multiple views...
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg119336.html
A/
I do not really care about math hover and splitlayout patches, they
can go in or be reverted as you wish.
I do want the 'allowing arbitrary listings parameter' patch to go in
before rc2. Otherwise, new features of listings can not be used.
Christian and I have to fix the dictionary downloading p
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3313
Strongly agreed.
Bo
I think this one should be in as it is marked critical now:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3750
If somebody can make a better patch I'm happy for that :-)
BTW, there are several other latex syntax that lyx
output but tex2lyx can't translate, results in the
lyx-exported .tex can't be i
José Matos wrote:
> That is in my todo list as well, I will work on the patch to fix it.
Thanks. Attached is the recent patch.
Jürgen
Index: lib/lyx2lyx/LyX.py
===
--- lib/lyx2lyx/LyX.py (Revision 18710)
+++ lib/lyx2lyx/LyX.py (Arbei
On Friday 08 June 2007 07:33:49 Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> I really like to finally get the patch for bug 1749 in. Just lyx2lyx is
> missing (but nobody seems to hear my call for help).
That is in my todo list as well, I will work on the patch to fix it.
> Jürgen
--
José Abílio
On Friday 08 June 2007 06:45:14 Anders Ekberg wrote:
> Since the most need for saving as 1.4.x should occur in the
> transition to 1.5, I think
> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3313
> should be addressed in 1.5.0. If the patch doesn't go in at least the
> error message needs to be impr
José Matos wrote:
> - What are the patches submitted that you think deserve attention?
> I would like to give special attention to critical bugs and so
> on...
I really like to finally get the patch for bug 1749 in. Just lyx2lyx is
missing (but nobody seems to hear my call for help).
Jür
José Matos Thu, 07 Jun 2007 16:05:49 -0700
- What are the patches submitted that you think deserve
attention?
I would like to give special attention to critical bugs and
so on.
Since the most need for saving as 1.4.x should occur in the
transition to 1.5, I think
http://bugz
Am 08.06.2007 um 01:22 schrieb Bennett Helm:
On Jun 7, 2007, at 7:01 PM, José Matos wrote:
Hi,
I have changed the proposed schedule for 1.5.0 taking into
account the delay
in the release of rc1. The new schedule can be found in the usual
place:
http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/ReleaseSchedule
On Jun 7, 2007, at 7:01 PM, José Matos wrote:
Hi,
I have changed the proposed schedule for 1.5.0 taking into account
the delay
in the release of rc1. The new schedule can be found in the usual
place:
http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/ReleaseSchedule
(Executive summary: rc2 - 15 June; final - 22 Ju
Hi,
I have changed the proposed schedule for 1.5.0 taking into account the
delay
in the release of rc1. The new schedule can be found in the usual place:
http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/ReleaseSchedule
(Executive summary: rc2 - 15 June; final - 22 June)
I would like to only allow fixes
42 matches
Mail list logo
