I wrote:
> On the road for LyX 1.6 I'll come up from time to time with the actual
> regression and major bug list.
A month has passed and here's the actual list of regressions:
http://tinyurl.com/2ndnqc
(Many of them are the result of the broken inset handling.)
Here's a list with the bugs targ
On the road for LyX 1.6 I'll come up from time to time with the actual
regression and major bug list.
Here's the actual list of regressions:
http://tinyurl.com/2ndnqc
(Many of them are the result of the broken inset handling.)
Here's a list with the bugs targetted for LyX 1.6, with severity maj
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 11:37:04PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 02:54:07PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >> Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> >> Unfortunately I cannot do much now as I hav
There's another regression I forgot in the list:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4406
(LyX-file drag and drop support is broken)
regards Uwe
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 02:54:07PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> >> Unfortunately I cannot do much now as I have an old installation
>> >> which doesn't do the newest qt.
>> >
>> > Well you cou
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 02:54:07PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Unfortunately I cannot do much now as I have an old installation
> >> which doesn't do the newest qt.
> >
> > Well you could try to compile qt yourself ;-)
>
> Been there,
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Unfortunately I cannot do much now as I have an old installation
>> which doesn't do the newest qt.
>
> Well you could try to compile qt yourself ;-)
Been there, done that. 4.2 was really more painful that 4.1 on my older
distrib. I guess this is p
Martin Vermeer wrote:
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 06:47:43PM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
The regressions collected in this wiki page:
http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/RegressionListSVN
are now in Bugzilla:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4397
(broken layout configuration)
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/sho
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 06:47:43PM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> The regressions collected in this wiki page:
> http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/RegressionListSVN
>
> are now in Bugzilla:
>
> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4397
> (broken layout configuration)
>
> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?
> isn't this identical problem to 4394 ?
I don't know. You reported bug 4394 for LyX 1.5.2, bug 4403 was reported by Helge for LyX 1.6svn as
regression to LyX 1.5.2.
regards Uwe
> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4403
> (pasting problem on Linux, not reproducible for me)
isn't this identical problem to 4394 ?
(yes, you can't confirm this on win, middle button pasting is X11 related
issue).
pavel
The regressions collected in this wiki page:
http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/RegressionListSVN
are now in Bugzilla:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4397
(broken layout configuration)
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4398
(date inset issue)
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4399
Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
I don't understand why bug:2529 and bug:2995 do not appear in
the list. These regressions are targeted to 1.4.x, is it the reason ?
[...]
Have you tried the beta 1? Maybe the situation is
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 04:16:14PM +, Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >
> > Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
>
> > > I don't understand why bug:2529 and bug:2995 do not appear in
> > > the list. These regressions are targeted to 1.4.x, is it the rea
Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
I don't understand why bug:2529 and bug:2995 do not appear in
the list. These regressions are targeted to 1.4.x, is it the reason ?
[...]
Have you tried the beta 1? Maybe the situation is
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jean-Pierre Chrétien wrote:
> > I don't understand why bug:2529 and bug:2995 do not appear in
> > the list. These regressions are targeted to 1.4.x, is it the reason ?
[...]
> Have you tried the beta 1? Maybe the situation is better WRT those bug
t now is to correct regressions introduced in
1.5.
As you will notice, I considered this regression list in the light of my bugs
:-)
Have you tried the beta 1? Maybe the situation is better WRT those bugs?
Abdel.
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/2lwwdx
>
>
Hello Abdel,
I don't understand why bug:2529 and bug:2995 do not appear in
the list. These regressions are targeted to 1.4.x, is it the reason ?
As you will notice, I considered this regre
http://tinyurl.com/2lwwdx
19 matches
Mail list logo
