--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dear Bo,
>
> >> > I found that I could convert all the python script to .exe.
> >> > Thus I can remove Pyhthon dependecy.
> >>
> >> Are you sure?
>
> > Also, there are some dynamically generated sh scripts that might be
> > translated to dynamically generated pytho
Dear Jean-Marc,
Bo>> convert.exe and aspell.exe should be easy to handle,
> be a static version also. Concerning aspell, the main problem will be
> the dictionaries.
I agree, spellchecking is hard to install It was hard for me to install
aspell, it took few mounth to get it working. It was hard to
> What will happen if I try to send an attachment to the mailing list?
> Is it allowed?
>
Please send the detailed instructions on how to do this to the list.
After we get rid of perl and mingw and have python scripts compiled
like this, we will be much closer to an everything-included lyx
distrib
Dear Mike,
>> > The downside is that you wind up with one copy of Python installed for
>> > every script. If you've only got one script, this is ok. If you've got
>> > more than one, you probably want to consider another approach.
>> It will be the same, using several scripts, too.
>>
>> I have
Dear Bo,
>> > I found that I could convert all the python script to .exe.
>> > Thus I can remove Pyhthon dependecy.
>>
>> Are you sure?
> Also, there are some dynamically generated sh scripts that might be
> translated to dynamically generated python script later so an
> interpreter is needed.
I
Dear Mike,
> Are you sure? The only way I know of to convert a python script to
> .exe is with py2exe, which does it by creating an executable archive,
> and putting all the scripts that make up the program and the python
> interpreter in the archive. It doesn't remove the Python dependency so
> m
