Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 15. November 2015 um 19:03:01, schrieb Georg Baum
>
>> Kornel Benko wrote:
>
>> Nice, but a pity that it is not python;-( Many years ago it was decided
>> that all scripts should be python, and everything was converted.
>
> We do not provide perl scripts, but de
Am Sonntag, 15. November 2015 um 19:03:01, schrieb Georg Baum
> Kornel Benko wrote:
>
> > Am Freitag, 13. November 2015 um 20:18:46, schrieb Georg Baum
> >
> >>
> >> I am tempted to write our own merge tool in python..
> >
> > I have a script ready, though it is perl.
>
> Nice, but a pity tha
Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Freitag, 13. November 2015 um 20:18:46, schrieb Georg Baum
>
>>
>> I am tempted to write our own merge tool in python..
>
> I have a script ready, though it is perl.
Nice, but a pity that it is not python;-( Many years ago it was decided that
all scripts should be pyth
Am Freitag, 13. November 2015 um 20:18:46, schrieb Georg Baum
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > This would be nice. If the only way to do things is with manual merging,
> > I'm happy to spend the time to learn how to do that. But if you think it
> > is possible to come up with a script that either
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> This would be nice. If the only way to do things is with manual merging,
> I'm happy to spend the time to learn how to do that. But if you think it
> is possible to come up with a script that either does the merging
> automatically or at least facilitates the merging, then
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 05:27:48PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote:
> Le 13/11/2015 16:58, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> >On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 07:12:52PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> >>Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>
> >>>Le 11/11/15 22:39, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> >Branch has less strings than
Le 13/11/2015 16:58, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 07:12:52PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 11/11/15 22:39, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
Branch has less strings than master. (6609 vs. 6817). And not all
strings from branch are common with master.
I
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 07:12:52PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> > Le 11/11/15 22:39, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> >>> Branch has less strings than master. (6609 vs. 6817). And not all
> >>> strings from branch are common with master.
> >>
> >> I see. So there is no rul
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 11/11/15 22:39, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
>>> Branch has less strings than master. (6609 vs. 6817). And not all
>>> strings from branch are common with master.
>>
>> I see. So there is no rule that I can use to do what I want then. I
>> guess I will just copy over
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 04:29:19PM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > Or is there another source of chaos?
>
> Unfortunately it is. It is called 'remerge of strings' when no new
> translations are added
> but po files are made up-to-date with the current source code.
> So if y
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Or is there another source of chaos?
Unfortunately it is. It is called 'remerge of strings' when no new translations
are added
but po files are made up-to-date with the current source code.
So if you have remerge in master all po files get touched although no new
transla
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:14:49PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 11/11/15 22:39, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> >>Branch has less strings than master. (6609 vs. 6817). And not all strings
> >>from branch
> >>are common with master.
> >
> >I see. So there is no rule that I can use to do what
Le 11/11/15 22:39, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
Branch has less strings than master. (6609 vs. 6817). And not all strings from
branch
are common with master.
I see. So there is no rule that I can use to do what I want then. I
guess I will just copy over the po files from branch that have not been
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 08:56:33PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 11. November 2015 um 13:59:39, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
>
> > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 07:46:46PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > > Am Mittwoch, 11. November 2015 um 13:14:11, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> > >
> > > > On Wed,
Am Mittwoch, 11. November 2015 um 13:59:39, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 07:46:46PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 11. November 2015 um 13:14:11, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> >
> > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:52:43AM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > > > Scott Kostys
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 07:46:46PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 11. November 2015 um 13:14:11, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
>
> > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:52:43AM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > > Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > > I thought I just needed to overwrite the trunk po files with
Am Mittwoch, 11. November 2015 um 13:14:11, schrieb Scott Kostyshak
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:52:43AM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > I thought I just needed to overwrite the trunk po files with the branch
> > > po files, but it seems there are changes in the trunk p
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:52:43AM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > I thought I just needed to overwrite the trunk po files with the branch
> > po files, but it seems there are changes in the trunk po files that are
> > not in branch (e.g. a73c2647). So what is the procedure f
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> I thought I just needed to overwrite the trunk po files with the branch
> po files, but it seems there are changes in the trunk po files that are
> not in branch (e.g. a73c2647). So what is the procedure for this?
This is somewhat chaotic territory, you can't be really sur
19 matches
Mail list logo
