> "Staffan" == Staffan Ringbom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Staffan> Hello, Seems like the seminar.layout would not be updated and
Staffan> I suspect an error in the seminar.layout. When I try to
Staffan> reconfigure a document to seminar I get an error message
Staffan> Error reading `~/.lyx-c
On 30 Jul 2002 10:37:28 +0200 wrote Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On 17 Jul 2002 11:33:15 -0400 wrote German Poo Caaman~o
> >> Since lyx-1.1.6-fix (AFAIR) I've been having some problems with
> >> seminar.layout. I defined frames on my slides, but now one slide
> >> appears with f
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> My problem is not really the new seminar layout but the that it
Lars> is introduced in 1.1.6fixX
Agreed.
Lars> IMO _no_ development should be done for 1.1.6, no code, no
Lars> features, no enhanced layouts. _only_ bugfixing.
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 09:53:16PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 09:31:34PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
| > | >
| > | > And why isn't it soon enough to provide this in
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 09:53:16PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 09:31:34PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> | >
> | > And why isn't it soon enough to provide this in 1.2.x?
> |
> | It is better sooner than later (so
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 09:31:34PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| >
| > And why isn't it soon enough to provide this in 1.2.x?
|
| It is better sooner than later (so fewer people will have documents with the
| old layout).
And what then about the e
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 09:31:34PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> And why isn't it soon enough to provide this in 1.2.x?
It is better sooner than later (so fewer people will have documents with the
old layout).
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 12:46:25PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > |
| > | If there are no objections, I will put my new layout in CVS (HEAD and 1.1.6).
| >
| > Why in 1.1.6? Is it backwards compabible with the old lyout?
|
| Because the current l
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 12:46:25PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> |
> | If there are no objections, I will put my new layout in CVS (HEAD and 1.1.6).
>
> Why in 1.1.6? Is it backwards compabible with the old lyout?
Because the current layout is very hard to use, and we should provide a
bet
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 08:59:03PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
| > The current layout file for the seminar class is very awkward to use:
| > 1. A comment paragraph is needed between every two slides
| > 2. It is hard to put slide headings (they need to be nes
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 08:59:03PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> The current layout file for the seminar class is very awkward to use:
> 1. A comment paragraph is needed between every two slides
> 2. It is hard to put slide headings (they need to be nested)
>
> I've tried to make a better layout fil
John jumbled,
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 01:26:25PM -0500, hawk wrote:
> > I've never been able to get this one to work, eiher way. I've
> > always ended up giving them to secretaries to separate the
> > slides and notes :)
> Well, it *used* to work a couple of years ago. Don't know what's
>
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 12:16:08AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> but note that slides is also lacking a lot and that is because of
> lacking featrues in LyX.
In fact, when I last tried to use "slides" in LyX, the "\onlyslide"
and "\onlynote" features of "slides.cls" flat-out refused to work
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 12:16:08AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj&resh;nnes wrote:
> Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | > I'd rather enhance lyx to give better support for these kinds of
> | > documentclasses.
> |
> | But how much time this will take ?
>
> The NEW_INSETS will pave the way for thi
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | I've tried to make a better layout file by using the same hack used in
| > | slides.layout.
When I wrote seminar.layout it was just to show that seminar could
also be used with LyX, I didn't put much effort in and actually hoped
that somebody woudld r
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 09:17:55PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj&resh;nnes wrote:
> Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | The current layout file for the seminar class is very awkward to use:
> | 1. A comment paragraph is needed between every two slides
> | 2. It is hard to put slide headings (the
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| The current layout file for the seminar class is very awkward to use:
| 1. A comment paragraph is needed between every two slides
| 2. It is hard to put slide headings (they need to be nested)
|
| I've tried to make a better layout file by using the same
Larry Marso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Incorporation of this package would be *much* appreciated here.
|
| On Fri, Mar 03, 2000 at 07:49:07PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| >
| > I had a quick look at this class and realized that to support this is
| > LyX is very _easy_, albeit _very_
Incorporation of this package would be *much* appreciated here.
On Fri, Mar 03, 2000 at 07:49:07PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> I had a quick look at this class and realized that to support this is
> LyX is very _easy_, albeit _very_ simple support.
19 matches
Mail list logo
