Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
> Yes, but also in the code you committed, all checkboxes were checked..
> Right ?
i swear i was checking it before commiting :)
but you are right it was broken indeed.
> if (level == Debug::ANY || levels == Debug::ANY
> || level == Debug::NONE || levels
-Original Message-
From: Pavel Sanda [mailto:sa...@lyx.org]
Sent: maandag 4 januari 2010 19:04
To: lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
Subject: Re: r32764 - lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4
>> >> Author: vfr
>> >> Date: Mon Jan 4 18:15:24 2010
>> >>
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
>
> >> Author: vfr
> >> Date: Mon Jan 4 18:15:24 2010
> >> New Revision: 32764
> >> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/32764
> >>
> >> Log:
> >> Simplify code introduced in r32761.
> >
> >now the case "lyx -dbg any" is broken
> >Pavel
>
> Can you explain
>> Author: vfr
>> Date: Mon Jan 4 18:15:24 2010
>> New Revision: 32764
>> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/32764
>>
>> Log:
>> Simplify code introduced in r32761.
>
>now the case "lyx -dbg any" is broken
>Pavel
Can you explain me.. I really really don't see a difference between the
two ve
v...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: vfr
> Date: Mon Jan 4 18:15:24 2010
> New Revision: 32764
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/32764
>
> Log:
> Simplify code introduced in r32761.
now the case "lyx -dbg any" is broken
pavel
> Modified:
>lyx-devel/trunk/src/frontends/qt4/GuiProgressView.cp
