Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>> if its on me then
>> formating changes will be reverted, since i use old and ugly bash script
>> and
>> i'm not going to spend my time to check whether new script work with old
>> branch
>> or touching the old beast script...
>
> I don't understand. Why can't you use the pytho
Pavel Sanda schrieb:
When you don't agree, we can
redefine the description environment to be the same as defined by amsart.
yes, i would like the output stays aproximately the same as it was before.
I'll do that.
second part is the branch file. if you want to take responsibility over the
s
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> amsart requires 3 modules and the file doesn't use any AMS-specific
> environment or command. Its usage is therefore not necessary. Using the
> article class assures that it can be compiled on every LaTeX environment. A
> colleague reported me that he couldn't compile the file
Pavel Sanda schrieb:
LFUNs.lyx: there is no need to use AMS for this file.
gen_lfuns.py: change the script accordingly and add the missing \spacing tag
why is ams problem?
now you have made from 35 pages 50 pages document.
amsart requires 3 modules and the file doesn't use any AMS-specific e
uwesto...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: uwestoehr
> Date: Mon Oct 19 02:01:01 2009
> New Revision: 31669
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/31669
>
> Log:
> LFUNs.lyx: there is no need to use AMS for this file.
> gen_lfuns.py: change the script accordingly and add the missing \spacing tag
why is
