Uwe Stöhr wrote: > amsart requires 3 modules and the file doesn't use any AMS-specific > environment or command. Its usage is therefore not necessary. Using the > article class assures that it can be compiled on every LaTeX environment. A > colleague reported me that he couldn't compile the file due to problems > with this AMS installation, that's why I noticed this issue. > The length of the file is not that important as I think users will use the > file as reference and don't print it out. When you don't agree, we can > redefine the description environment to be the same as defined by amsart.
yes, i would like the output stays aproximately the same as it was before. second part is the branch file. if you want to take responsibility over the synchronization with LyXAction.cpp its up to you now. if its on me then formating changes will be reverted, since i use old and ugly bash script and i'm not going to spend my time to check whether new script work with old branch or touching the old beast script... pavel
