Re: question about the description of TEXINPUTS

2011-10-16 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 11:55:51PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 16.10.2011 19:29, schrieb Enrico Forestieri: > > >>When replaced by If. > > > >And, according to you, that's the grammar error? > > Our docs were during the last year kindly reviewed by Mr. Hudson - a > lector in a publishing compan

Re: question about the description of TEXINPUTS

2011-10-16 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 16.10.2011 19:29, schrieb Enrico Forestieri: When replaced by If. And, according to you, that's the grammar error? Our docs were during the last year kindly reviewed by Mr. Hudson - a lector in a publishing company. He corrected almost all my when to if for the case that when was to refe

Re: question about the description of TEXINPUTS

2011-10-16 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 04:54:11PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 16.10.2011 11:18, schrieb Enrico Forestieri: > > >>What is so difficult to have a look at my initial post of this thread. > > > >Yes, I saw it, but I still don't know what grammar errors you are > >referring to. > > When replaced by

Re: question about the description of TEXINPUTS

2011-10-16 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 16.10.2011 11:18, schrieb Enrico Forestieri: What is so difficult to have a look at my initial post of this thread. Yes, I saw it, but I still don't know what grammar errors you are referring to. When replaced by If.

Re: question about the description of TEXINPUTS

2011-10-16 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 04:25:26AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 15.10.2011 23:46, schrieb Enrico Forestieri: > > >I don't know what grammar errors you are referring to, > > What is so difficult to have a look at my initial post of this thread. Yes, I saw it, but I still don't know what grammar

Re: question about the description of TEXINPUTS

2011-10-15 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 15.10.2011 23:46, schrieb Enrico Forestieri: I'm giving up, but you should try yourself to answer the following question. What happens if TEXINPUTS is already set in the environment when LyX is launched? Then it would be a prefix. But this is not the case except I add this variable manuall

Re: question about the description of TEXINPUTS

2011-10-15 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 10:46:00PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 15.10.2011 22:41, schrieb Enrico Forestieri: > > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environment_variable#Local_to_process > > So it is only available while LyX is executed (as if I use the > command "set" in a batch file). But then it is

Re: question about the description of TEXINPUTS

2011-10-15 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 15.10.2011 22:41, schrieb Enrico Forestieri: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environment_variable#Local_to_process So it is only available while LyX is executed (as if I use the command "set" in a batch file). But then it is no prefix to an existing variable, but the variable itself. That was

Re: question about the description of TEXINPUTS

2011-10-15 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 10:13:34PM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Am 15.10.2011 19:31, schrieb Enrico Forestieri: > > >>As I understand the explanation TEXINPUTS is an _environment > >>variable_ consisting of a list of paths. So why is it then also a > >>_prefix_? > > > >Because TEXINPUTS may already

Re: question about the description of TEXINPUTS

2011-10-15 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 15.10.2011 19:31, schrieb Enrico Forestieri: As I understand the explanation TEXINPUTS is an _environment variable_ consisting of a list of paths. So why is it then also a _prefix_? Because TEXINPUTS may already be set in the environment, I must admit that I then did not yet understand th

Re: question about the description of TEXINPUTS

2011-10-15 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 04:18:39AM +0200, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > As I understand the explanation TEXINPUTS is an _environment > variable_ consisting of a list of paths. So why is it then also a > _prefix_? Because TEXINPUTS may already be set in the environment, in which case its content should be ap