Re: patch for FormParagraph

2001-03-04 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Edwin Leuven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Anyway, thanks to you guys find/replace is now guii (over here). | I've got the | following dilemma on which I need your advice. Find/replace uses generalized | copies of the members FindBackward(), FindForward(), and IsStringInText() | from the LyXT

Re: patch for FormParagraph

2001-03-04 Thread Edwin Leuven
> > blah. > > > > Careful... We've only just recovered from the last time this conversation > > was started!!! > > They mostly don't join in because they mostly never have. I guess they are just being wise... > Either that or > they are content with the xforms frontend as is like most o

Re: patch for FormParagraph

2001-03-03 Thread Allan Rae
On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Angus Leeming wrote: > On Friday 02 March 2001 15:42, Edwin Leuven wrote: > > and what *I* don't understand is why people don't join in for a week or > > two to get the qt2 port working and ditch those f***ing xforms instead. > blah. > > Careful... We've only just recovere

Re: patch for FormParagraph

2001-03-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes: | seems I was a bit optimistic. But even if we reduce the binary or | break even I really think the use of scoped_ptr makes the code | nicer. Ok, I was very optimistic. However I claim that use of scoped_ptr makes the code cleaner and easier to und

Re: patch for FormParagraph

2001-03-02 Thread Edwin Leuven
> blah. > > Careful... We've only just recovered from the last time this conversation > was started!!! Sorry, but the combination of friday afternoon and xform frustration proved to be too combustible :) > > ps. I really want to minimize my understanding of xforms. > > Sure. Use fdesign

Re: patch for FormParagraph

2001-03-02 Thread Angus Leeming
On Friday 02 March 2001 15:49, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Pleas don't wait with the commit. I am not doing anything large, so > the conflicts will be small. Done

Re: patch for FormParagraph

2001-03-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Friday 02 March 2001 15:13, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > I am currently building the mvc branch, and will go trough this and | > make _small_ changes. but I will not commit until you have had a look | > at the resulting patch. | | Ok, dokey. Look

Re: patch for FormParagraph

2001-03-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > Should we also address the issue of memory footprint. Allan originally had it | > so that dialog_ was deleted when the Dialog was closed and recreated it once | > again when it was reopened. | | I'd favour short code over small memory footprint (wi

Re: patch for FormParagraph

2001-03-02 Thread Angus Leeming
On Friday 02 March 2001 15:42, Edwin Leuven wrote: > and what *I* don't understand is why people don't join in for a week or > two to get the qt2 port working and ditch those f***ing xforms instead. blah. Careful... We've only just recovered from the last time this conversation was started

Re: patch for FormParagraph

2001-03-02 Thread John Levon
On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Edwin Leuven wrote: > ...and what *I* don't understand is why people don't join in for a week or > two to get the qt2 port working and ditch those f***ing xforms instead. blah. I think we've had this discussion before. Like I said I doubt anything would happened unless any f

Re: patch for FormParagraph

2001-03-02 Thread Angus Leeming
On Friday 02 March 2001 15:15, John Levon wrote: > On 2 Mar 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > > I am currently building the mvc branch, and will go trough this and > > make _small_ changes. but I will not commit until you have had a look > > at the resulting patch. > > > > Lgb > > *

Re: patch for FormParagraph

2001-03-02 Thread Angus Leeming
On Friday 02 March 2001 15:13, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > I am currently building the mvc branch, and will go trough this and > make _small_ changes. but I will not commit until you have had a look > at the resulting patch. Ok, dokey. Look forward to it. I've merged the changes to HEAD into my

Re: patch for FormParagraph

2001-03-02 Thread Edwin Leuven
...and what *I* don't understand is why people don't join in for a week or two to get the qt2 port working and ditch those f***ing xforms instead. blah. Sorry but putting xform find replace in frontends is *no fun* :-( And while I am grumbling perhaps someone can give me some xform tips. The fi

Re: patch for FormParagraph

2001-03-02 Thread Andre Poenitz
> Should we also address the issue of memory footprint. Allan originally had it > so that dialog_ was deleted when the Dialog was closed and recreated it once > again when it was reopened. I'd favour short code over small memory footprint (within reasonable limits). Andre' -- André Pönitz ..

Re: patch for FormParagraph

2001-03-02 Thread Andre Poenitz
> | Does this translate to "Kleinvieh macht auch Mist"? > > I am not sure what the english saying is... but the meaning is > "several small rivers make a great one" Well... the idea is the same. "small domestic animals produce droppings, too" Actually my dictionary translates the whole sentenc

Re: patch for FormParagraph

2001-03-02 Thread John Levon
On 2 Mar 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > I am currently building the mvc branch, and will go trough this and > make _small_ changes. but I will not commit until you have had a look > at the resulting patch. > > Lgb *please* don't tie the frontends down to recreating the dialogs every

Re: patch for FormParagraph

2001-03-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Friday 02 March 2001 14:14, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > I suspect that the same thing could be done to most of the forms. | > (this change alone reduces binary size with some ~300 bytes. "Who | > Cares!" I hear you yell. Well I do... "mange små bl

Re: patch for FormParagraph

2001-03-02 Thread John Levon
On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Angus Leeming wrote: > Should we also address the issue of memory footprint. Allan originally had it > so that dialog_ was deleted when the Dialog was closed and recreated it once > again when it was reopened. I removed this code when I wrote the FormBase > heirarchy of cla

Re: patch for FormParagraph

2001-03-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > "mange små blir en stor å" | | Does this translate to "Kleinvieh macht auch Mist"? don't know... I am not sure what the english saying is... but the meaning is "several small rivers make a great one" (små == small, å = river (short word eh? (here

Re: patch for FormParagraph

2001-03-02 Thread Angus Leeming
On Friday 02 March 2001 14:14, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > I suspect that the same thing could be done to most of the forms. > (this change alone reduces binary size with some ~300 bytes. "Who > Cares!" I hear you yell. Well I do... "mange små blir en stor å") > > Lgb Sorry, my knowledge of Nor

Re: patch for FormParagraph

2001-03-02 Thread Andre Poenitz
> "mange små blir en stor å" Does this translate to "Kleinvieh macht auch Mist"? Andre' -- André Pönitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]