On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 11:50:31AM +0100, Ozgur Ugras BARAN wrote:
> It is so rare that, It is fantastic not to be wrong. :))
>
> then it should work well for the case \command[][]{}
>
> any comments on backporting this feature to lyx 1.4.x ?? it shouldn't
> take too much time for me..
Have it
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 09:19:14AM +0100, Ozgur Ugras BARAN wrote:
> Therefore the command and its parameters are isolated from anything else,
> including another {}. Am I wrong?? (probably I am :) )
Erm. No. I was probably thinking about tex2lyx or such.
Should be pretty safe given this explan
OK.. I'll start next week, but I am not sure when I can finish. It can take
time depending on my free time.
I am very glad that you will handle lyx2lyx conversion :)
On Monday 11 September 2006 13:24, Georg Baum wrote:
> You change InsetCommandParams to support a name,value pair interface for
> parameters and send it to the list for review. When it is OK you can change
> the existing insets to use the new interface. After that Jose or I create
> the necessary l
Ozgur Ugras BARAN wrote:
> Well, I didn't like the way to store LaTeX commands, either. I am not
> sure that I am brave enough to (or capable of) develop that part, but
> I can give it a try.
Great!
> However, in my incredibly humble opinion, the syntax should be based
> on a markup language (pr
Well, I didn't like the way to store LaTeX commands, either. I am not
sure that I am brave enough to (or capable of) develop that part, but
I can give it a try.
However, in my incredibly humble opinion, the syntax should be based
on a markup language (preferably XML), which is planned for lyx-1.6
Ozgur Ugras BARAN wrote:
> It is so rare that, It is fantastic not to be wrong. :))
>
> then it should work well for the case \command[][]{}
The fact that InsetCommand stores its parameters in LaTeX-like syntax in LyX
files is a historical mistake, so I would rather avoid to extend this even
fu
It is so rare that, It is fantastic not to be wrong. :))
then it should work well for the case \command[][]{}
any comments on backporting this feature to lyx 1.4.x ?? it shouldn't
take too much time for me..
On 9/11/06, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Ozgur" == Ozgur Ug
> "Ozgur" == Ozgur Ugras BARAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ozgur> \begin_inset LatexCommand \command[]{}{} \end_inset
Ozgur> Therefore the command and its parameters are isolated from
Ozgur> anything else, including another {}. Am I wrong?? (probably I
Ozgur> am :) )
No you are not!
JMarc
On 9/8/06, Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 03:24:56PM +0100, Ozgur Ugras BARAN wrote:
> and last of all, I developed this against the lyx 1.5.x. However, (if
> insetCommandParams mod. is correct) there is no reason not to add this
> functionality in lyx 1.4.x
>
On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 03:24:56PM +0100, Ozgur Ugras BARAN wrote:
> and last of all, I developed this against the lyx 1.5.x. However, (if
> insetCommandParams mod. is correct) there is no reason not to add this
> functionality in lyx 1.4.x
>
> with my kindest regards,
As usual: Things about whic
11 matches
Mail list logo
