Re: minimum python version

2007-02-05 Thread José Matos
On Sunday 04 February 2007 9:26:31 am Georg Baum wrote: > Am Samstag, 3. Februar 2007 18:29 schrieb Enrico Forestieri: > > I think that 2.3 already is a requirement, as stated in the README file. We have decided for 2.3 due to its support of unicode, what you have done just reinforces that argu

Re: minimum python version

2007-02-04 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 10:26:31AM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > Am Samstag, 3. Februar 2007 18:29 schrieb Enrico Forestieri: > > > I think that 2.3 already is a requirement, as stated in the README file. > > Oops, you are right. I remembered that we decided 2.2, but was wrong > obviously. That w

Re: minimum python version

2007-02-04 Thread Georg Baum
Am Samstag, 3. Februar 2007 18:29 schrieb Enrico Forestieri: > I think that 2.3 already is a requirement, as stated in the README file. Oops, you are right. I remembered that we decided 2.2, but was wrong obviously. Georg

Re: minimum python version

2007-02-03 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 03:06:14PM +, John Levon wrote: > On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 12:15:43PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > > > I just noticed that I unintentionally raised the minimum required python > > version by using unicodedata.normalize() for the InsetLatexAccent > > conversions in lyx2l

Re: minimum python version

2007-02-03 Thread John Levon
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 12:15:43PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > I just noticed that I unintentionally raised the minimum required python > version by using unicodedata.normalize() for the InsetLatexAccent > conversions in lyx2lyx. > > What are we going to do here? The problem is that normalizatio