On Wednesday 05 March 2003 12:39 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 12:33:59PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Thanks for the info. You make it sound like IU could be done with
> > relatively little effort once the mathed XYZinset equivalent of insetXYZ
> > has been created.
>
> For
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 12:33:59PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Thanks for the info. You make it sound like IU could be done with relatively
> little effort once the mathed XYZinset equivalent of insetXYZ has been
> created.
For the leaves in the inset tree certainly. The upper layers require t
On Wednesday 05 March 2003 12:21 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 11:55:01AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Incidentally, what needs to be done to unify InsetRef and RefInset? Do
> > we need a placeholder in the outside world analogous to formalabase?
>
> Aehm, of course a lightw
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 11:55:01AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Incidentally, what needs to be done to unify InsetRef and RefInset? Do
> we need a placeholder in the outside world analogous to formalabase?
Aehm, of course a lightweight copy of formalabase that contains a RefInset
instead of the M
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 11:55:01AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > If we really need 'one or zero', MathArray would be the way to go.
> > But I doubt this is possible, as the empty label string can serve the same
> > purpose.
>
> Ok. I''ll think about it.
Aehm.. I wanted to ssay:
But I doubt th
On Wednesday 05 March 2003 11:39 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > Ditto, the LabelInset can now be removed. How do we tell the
> > mathhullinset that the LabelInset in the MathAtom is now gone?
>
> Reset the label to an empty string and let the write/whatever method handle
> that case. There is no "emp
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 11:25:39AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Ignorance. A MathAtom would just contain a LabelInset* in this case, right?
Yes, with value semantics. Otherwise tyou would have to start writing
c'ctor, operator= and dtor.
> 'Apply' is a bit complicated as the mathhullinset's dis
On Wednesday 05 March 2003 11:08 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 07:10:56PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > * InsetLatex::latex escapes the contents of the label. Should I create a
> > write method for LabelInset that does the same with the contents of
> > cell(0)?
>
> I dont thi
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 07:10:56PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> * InsetLatex::latex escapes the contents of the label. Should I create a
> write method for LabelInset that does the same with the contents of
> cell(0)?
I dont think so, as cell(0).write() produces valid LaTeX per se.
> * In m
