On Wednesday 05 March 2003 11:39 am, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > Ditto, the LabelInset can now be removed. How do we tell the > > mathhullinset that the LabelInset in the MathAtom is now gone? > > Reset the label to an empty string and let the write/whatever method handle > that case. There is no "empty MathAtom" and so far I resisted the > tempatation to make that possible. > > If we really need 'one or zero', MathArray would be the way to go. > But I doubt this is possible, as the empty label string can serve the same > purpose.
Ok. I''ll think about it. > > Could you provide me with a broad-brush outline of what you think needs > > to be done. > > Uh, I think this is none of the most pressing problems right now... > > [Just in case you ask what _is_ pressing: Line breaking in ParInset and > multicolumn for TabularInset are much more important...] > > If you want to play with IU a bit you could look at > math_tabularinset/math_gridinset and make it work with the tabular dialog > ;-) ;-) Well I think that I disagree with you. I prefer an incremental approach; fix the nearly working first before breaking the next bit. Work still needs to be done on button insets in mathed but they are 'almost there'. As for the tabular dialog; I haven't ported it to the new scheme yet. Thereafter, getting it to work with mathed will be trivial. (Painful, but trivial.) Incidentally, what needs to be done to unify InsetRef and RefInset? Do we need a placeholder in the outside world analogous to formalabase? > > Andre'
