On Wed, Feb 03, 1999 at 01:14:46AM -0600, Mate Wierdl wrote:
> Yes, I just subscribed you to the devel list as [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> you in turn might want to fix your envelope sender address which is
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] as can be seen from
Not only that, but it loks like you also removed the
On Wed, Feb 03, 1999 at 04:03:59PM -0500, Rich Fields at 407.356.5842 wrote:
>
> I'm glad you said this. I'd never been there before and was
> rather appalled when I looked at /. for the first
> time a few minutes ago. I wouldn't worry about lack of
> coverage from this place...
Probably not t
Unfortunately it is regarded __the__ most powerfule ezine of the Linux
community. It's doing more damage these days then anything...
Ignoring is the only choice :-)
Roland
On 03-Feb-99 Rich Fields at 407.356.5842 wrote:
> Roland Krause wrote
>> Yes, as Tex for dummies, I'd rather not seen it th
Roland Krause wrote
> Yes, as Tex for dummies, I'd rather not seen it there at all.
> To be honest, I am getting pretty fed up with that psycho-kiddie website.
> It was really good in the very beginning, but now its just your average
> 90/10 web hangout.
I'm glad you said this. I'd never been th
Wehell,
On 03-Feb-99 Richard E. Hawkins Esq. wrote:
>
> roland rolled,
>
>> That's what I was saying,
>> if you want the /. dudes attention you'll have to go over the license.
>> But as Rick is the only one who has a clue about that, I would ask him.
>> He's the guy who they are going to flame
On Wed, Feb 03, 1999 at 02:32:49PM -0600, Roland Krause wrote:
> That's what I was saying,
> if you want the /. dudes attention you'll have to go over the license.
> But as Rick is the only one who has a clue about that, I would ask him.
> He's the guy who they are going to flame the living crap
roland rolled,
> That's what I was saying,
> if you want the /. dudes attention you'll have to go over the license.
> But as Rick is the only one who has a clue about that, I would ask him.
> He's the guy who they are going to flame the living crap out of...
They're not even in my league :) Y
That's what I was saying,
if you want the /. dudes attention you'll have to go over the license.
But as Rick is the only one who has a clue about that, I would ask him.
He's the guy who they are going to flame the living crap out of...
Roland
On 03-Feb-99 Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
>> "ja
> "ja wrote in to say that LyX, TeX a frontend for dummies has officially hit
> v1.0".
>
> Thanks folks :-( With such friends, who needs to worry about the license?
Well, at least the linuxtoday.com site posted the press release.
Let's hope LWN, freshmeat and the others will make a more proper
> Also, list problems usually are due to misconfigured mailers, and so
> we get a chance to fix them.
you can be very sure that I did indeed follow the
specified instructions as given. And that I received no response from
the subscription daemon whatsoever.
Yes, I just subscr
In slashdot quickies:
"ja wrote in to say that LyX, TeX a frontend for dummies has officially hit
v1.0".
Thanks folks :-( With such friends, who needs to worry about the license?
Martin
On Mon, Feb 01, 1999 at 09:49:01PM -0600, Mate Wierdl wrote:
>ps the good news is that regardless of my annoying response, Mate can
>probably just make the change for you.
>
> True, but it would be good if people would figure out how to help
> themselves, otherwise I would end up manually
ps the good news is that regardless of my annoying response, Mate can
probably just make the change for you.
True, but it would be good if people would figure out how to help
themselves, otherwise I would end up manually subscribing everybody.
Also, list problems usually are due to misconfi
On Mon, Feb 01, 1999 at 09:51:34PM -0500, John Weiss wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 31, 1999 at 02:49:28PM -0600, Mate Wierdl wrote:
> > Developers' list:
> > =
> >
> > The address of the list is
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > To subscribe, send any (even completely empty) message
On Sun, Jan 31, 1999 at 02:49:28PM -0600, Mate Wierdl wrote:
> Developers' list:
> =
>
> The address of the list is
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To subscribe, send any (even completely empty) message to
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> You will get a request to confirm your s
I definitely hope (at least some of) those changes will be made.
What are we going to do about the lyx-users list? Hm. I went to
mail-archive.com and noticed that the latest message to lyx-users, with
subject "Titlepage Etc." is one I never received. Am I supposed to be
subscribed to more mailing
16 matches
Mail list logo
