Re: lyx-tester

2013-07-27 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > >> I would be very interested in a unit test framework but I do not know >> how to set that up. Can this go to trunk (after the 2.1 release if there is risk)? Scott

Re: lyx-tester

2013-07-26 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Freitag, 26. Juli 2013 um 15:34:43, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn > > > I would be very interested in a unit test framework but I do not know > > how to set that up. > > > > Scott > > I have a branch in my personal repo that has a unit testing framework > base on google test. > > http:/

Re: lyx-tester

2013-07-26 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Op 25-7-2013 19:39, Scott Kostyshak schreef: On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Another thing is that we probably don't want to test the documents in the attic directory. I've changed my mind a couple of times on this. Right now my opinion is that I disagree. It de

Re: lyx-tester

2013-07-26 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
I would be very interested in a unit test framework but I do not know how to set that up. Scott I have a branch in my personal repo that has a unit testing framework base on google test. http://git.lyx.org/?p=developers/vfr/lyx.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/tests Vincent

Re: lyx-tester

2013-07-25 Thread Pavel Sanda
Scott Kostyshak wrote: > In any case, either attic should be skipped or the compilation of the > files should be fixed. I prefer the second. If you are worried about the destiny of e.g. polish doc files than the correct question is why Uwe moved them to attic. I understand his motivation but I had

Re: lyx-tester

2013-07-25 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Donnerstag, 25. Juli 2013 um 13:38:49, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Liviu Andronic > wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >> - git clones and compiles the LyX master branch > >> > > If on Ubuntu, would be possible that instead of

Re: lyx-tester

2013-07-25 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Donnerstag, 25. Juli 2013 um 13:37:36, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > Some of the lyx-files, mostly for ja-lang are not ready yet, but that is > > valid on all platforms. > > The tests for the Japanese example files all pass for me now (

Re: lyx-tester

2013-07-25 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Donnerstag, 25. Juli 2013 um 13:39:59, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > > > > Another thing is that we probably don't want to test the documents in the > > attic directory. > > I've changed my mind a couple of times on this. Right no

Re: lyx-tester

2013-07-25 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > > Another thing is that we probably don't want to test the documents in the > attic directory. I've changed my mind a couple of times on this. Right now my opinion is that I disagree. It depends what we want to test for. Do we want

Re: lyx-tester

2013-07-25 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 25. Juli 2013 um 14:29:44, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn > >> I also couldn't really figure out how it is determined which formats to > >> export to. It checks the default output format, it reads configure.py, so > >> it coul

Re: lyx-tester

2013-07-25 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote: > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> - git clones and compiles the LyX master branch >> > If on Ubuntu, would be possible that instead of this hugely time and > resource consuming step that the daily PPA be used instea

Re: lyx-tester

2013-07-25 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > Some of the lyx-files, mostly for ja-lang are not ready yet, but that is > valid on all platforms. The tests for the Japanese example files all pass for me now (after changing to pdf3 default). Koji is still working on the manuals. Scott

Re: lyx-tester

2013-07-25 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:31 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > > I don't want to be negative, I appreciate that people are actually looking > into testing of LyX, but I just want to head towards a testing scheme that I > can actually use. So, here I will list some thing that may be improved or >

Re: lyx-tester

2013-07-25 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 5:46 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > > I have one comment:.. testing should be made much easier than this. I agree that it would be great if a user could run as many tests as possible without extra scripts. However, this is not the point of lyx-tester. The point of lyx

Re: lyx-tester

2013-07-25 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: > ** > > > Lastly, maybe it should test export to lyx20 instead of lyx16 now. > > > > > > > This should not be so difficult :) > > > Another thing is that we probably don't want to test the documents in the attic directory. Vincent

Re: lyx-tester

2013-07-25 Thread Liviu Andronic
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > - git clones and compiles the LyX master branch > If on Ubuntu, would be possible that instead of this hugely time and resource consuming step that the daily PPA be used instead? Or would the builds need to be compiled in a specific way? L

Re: lyx-tester

2013-07-25 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: > ** > > Am Donnerstag, 25. Juli 2013 um 14:29:44, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn < > v...@lyx.org> > > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > > > > > ** > > > > > > > > > > > 4. As said before, until now I've never been

Re: lyx-tester

2013-07-25 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Donnerstag, 25. Juli 2013 um 14:29:44, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: > > > ** > > > > > 4. As said before, until now I've never been able to run all tests > > > > > successfully. Latest attempt fails on exporting luatex, > > > > > > >

Re: lyx-tester

2013-07-25 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Kornel Benko wrote: > ** > > 4. As said before, until now I've never been able to run all tests > > > successfully. Latest attempt fails on exporting luatex, > > > > Do you have TL2013 installed, or are you using what ubuntu provides? > > I have no problems on u

Re: lyx-tester

2013-07-25 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Donnerstag, 25. Juli 2013 um 13:31:03, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn > > > > > Please let me know if you have any comments. > > > > > > Scott > > > > > > I have one comment:.. testing should be made much easier than this. > > > > How? > > > > Stephan > > > > I don't want to be negative, I ap

Re: lyx-tester

2013-07-25 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
> > > Please let me know if you have any comments. > > > > Scott > > > > I have one comment:.. testing should be made much easier than this. > > How? > > Stephan > I don't want to be negative, I appreciate that people are actually looking into testing of LyX, but I just want to head towards a test

Re: lyx-tester

2013-07-25 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 25.07.2013 um 11:46 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn : > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Attached are scripts that help with testing LyX. The main idea is that > you can download this tar.gz into a fresh Ubuntu install (e.g. in a > virtual box) and run all LyX tests wit

Re: lyx-tester

2013-07-25 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Attached are scripts that help with testing LyX. The main idea is that > you can download this tar.gz into a fresh Ubuntu install (e.g. in a > virtual box) and run all LyX tests with just one command: > sudo ./lyx-tester > > Let that run