Re: iso-8859-13

2004-08-03 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 11:43:31AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes spake thusly: > > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Martin> OK, that's done then. We'll hear about if it is wrong. > > I applied that to 1.3.x too. > > JMarc Great! - Martin pgpYQmHRnoSwF.pgp Descr

Re: iso-8859-13

2004-08-03 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Martin> OK, that's done then. We'll hear about if it is wrong. I applied that to 1.3.x too. JMarc

Re: iso-8859-13

2004-08-03 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Martin> OK, that's done then. We'll hear about if it is wrong. Thanks. JMarc

Re: iso-8859-13

2004-08-03 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 05:36:12PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes spake thusly: > > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Martin> On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 04:56:42PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > Martin> spake thusly: > >> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: iso-8859-13

2004-08-02 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Martin> On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 04:56:42PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes Martin> spake thusly: >> > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Martin> I see that nobody fixed the missing quote bug. It should be OK Marti

Re: iso-8859-13

2004-08-02 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 04:56:42PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes spake thusly: > > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Martin> I see that nobody fixed the missing quote bug. It should be OK > Martin> now (although I am still not convinced the fontenc is > Martin> necessa

Re: iso-8859-13

2004-08-02 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Martin> I see that nobody fixed the missing quote bug. It should be OK Martin> now (although I am still not convinced the fontenc is Martin> necessary) I would just remove it, and wait until someone complains. What do you think of that?

Re: iso-8859-13

2004-08-02 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 02:33:03PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes spake thusly: > > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Martin> Trying again. Ah, that's better. I have to press the 'attach' > Martin> button... > > >> is latin-7 the same as iso-8859-13? > > I see that t

Re: iso-8859-13

2004-06-30 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 14:33:03 +0200 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Martin> Trying again. Ah, that's better. I have to press the 'attach' > Martin> button... > > >> is latin-7 the same as iso-8859-13? > > I see t

Re: iso-8859-13

2004-06-24 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Martin> Trying again. Ah, that's better. I have to press the 'attach' Martin> button... >> is latin-7 the same as iso-8859-13? I see that the patch has been applied, but the following line seems suspicious to me: +icelandic iceland

Re: iso-8859-13

2004-06-17 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 09:01:19 +0200 Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | This is the patch that *should* allow latvian/lithuanian to work > | with latin-7. > > What patch? The one that ought to have been attached to the previous mail,

Re: iso-8859-13

2004-06-17 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | This is the patch that *should* allow latvian/lithuanian to work | with latin-7. What patch? is latin-7 the same as iso-8859-13? -- Lgb