> | libsigc++ is now completely seperated from the gtkmm development so
> | technically we're already guii using it.
>
> If gtkmm requires certain versions of sigc++ then from our point of
> view that is not quite correct.
This is true. Though I think, (I'll have to confirm with the libsigc
guy
On Wednesday 10 April 2002 5:07 am, Allan Rae wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, John Levon wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 11:08:11AM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> > > There is still a small problem with Qt's insistence on claiming the
> > > name emit as a keyword but the libsigc++ crew have made some
Michael Koziarski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| At 12:39 AM 4/10/02 +0200, you wrote:
>>Michael Koziarski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> >> > Is there an easy way around this?
>> >>
>> >>Yes. Get LyX's version upgraded for LyX 1.3!
>> >>Angus
>> >
>>| Wasn't there talk of using boost's signa
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 11:08:11AM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
>
> > There is still a small problem with Qt's insistence on claiming the
> > name emit as a keyword but the libsigc++ crew have made some recent
> > changes to avoid most of the problems there.
>
On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 11:08:11AM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> There is still a small problem with Qt's insistence on claiming the
> name emit as a keyword but the libsigc++ crew have made some recent
> changes to avoid most of the problems there.
Practically that's not a problem for me.
regards
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Michael Koziarski wrote:
> At 12:39 AM 4/10/02 +0200, you wrote:
> >Michael Koziarski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > >> > Is there an easy way around this?
> > >>
> > >>Yes. Get LyX's version upgraded for LyX 1.3!
> > >>Angus
That's my inclination also.
> >| Wasn't t
At 12:39 AM 4/10/02 +0200, you wrote:
>Michael Koziarski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> > Is there an easy way around this?
> >>
> >>Yes. Get LyX's version upgraded for LyX 1.3!
> >>Angus
> >
>| Wasn't there talk of using boost's signal / slot mechanism?
>
>I have thought about that...
>
>De
Michael Koziarski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Is there an easy way around this?
>>
>>Yes. Get LyX's version upgraded for LyX 1.3!
>>Angus
>
| Wasn't there talk of using boost's signal / slot mechanism?
I have thought about that...
Depends a bit on what other folk say.
I feel that we sho
> > Is there an easy way around this?
>
>Yes. Get LyX's version upgraded for LyX 1.3!
>Angus
Wasn't there talk of using boost's signal / slot mechanism?If not,
I'll prepare the necessary patches after 1.2.0.
Cheers
Koz
"Technology is dominated by two types of people: those who underst
On Tuesday 09 April 2002 1:08 am, Michael Koziarski wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I can report the the new build system for GNOME ... is working.
>
> However with the impending release of GNOME 2 I want to start the porting
> effort, while the majority of the C++ will be trivial, one NULL argument
> to
10 matches
Mail list logo
