On Wednesday 10 April 2002 5:07 am, Allan Rae wrote: > On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, John Levon wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 11:08:11AM +1000, Allan Rae wrote: > > > There is still a small problem with Qt's insistence on claiming the > > > name emit as a keyword but the libsigc++ crew have made some recent > > > changes to avoid most of the problems there. > > > > Practically that's not a problem for me. > > I think all the code in LyX uses the operator() form instead of the > emit(). So we shouldn't have anything to worry about. > > Allan. (ARRae)
Now you're just making stuff up! Nonetheless, none of the _qt_ stuff uses the emit(). Angus
