On Fri, Nov 26, 1999 at 05:52:05PM +0100, Andre' Poenitz wrote:
> > Compliments, what compliments? Those were very (not so) subtle jokes and
> > you didn't notice.
>
> Jokes on a Friday? Come on, Jose', you should know better!
I'm very sorry for the mistake, what I intend to say was "Those w
> Compliments, what compliments? Those were very (not so) subtle jokes and
> you didn't notice.
Jokes on a Friday? Come on, Jose', you should know better!
Andre'
--
Andre' Poenitz .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Nov 26, 1999 at 05:35:37PM +0100, Andre' Poenitz wrote:
> > >> I think we have a bit different notion about what a "hack" is.
> >
> > Asger> You're a great diplomat.
> > Lars, diplomat? You're a great diplomat, Asger.
> > JMarc
> Something is wrong... *scratch head* ... awfully wrong...
> >> I think we have a bit different notion about what a "hack" is.
>
> Asger> You're a great diplomat.
>
> Lars, diplomat? You're a great diplomat, Asger.
> JMarc
Something is wrong... *scratch head* ... awfully wrong...
You are not supposed to make compliments to each other on a *Friday*.
T
> "Asger" == Asger K Alstrup Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> My point was: Much code that was from the beginning thought to be
>> temporary and soon to be replaced never got replaced.
Asger> My point is that this is ok sometimes.
Like the delete-actually-cuts bug. Conceptually it sho
> My point was: Much code that was from the beginning thought to be
> temporaray and soon to be replaced never got replaced.
My point is that this is ok sometimes.
> I think we have a bit different notion about what a "hack" is.
You're a great diplomat.
Cheers,
Asger
> "Asger" == Asger K Alstrup Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Asger> Regarding epsilon and varepsilon: May I suggest that we map
Asger> both varepsilon and epsilon to varepsilon? This is only a
Asger> problem when you want to use both variants in a document, and
Asger> that is in my experi
"Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | Sometimes a hack is fully sufficient.
| >
| > Not when a better solution exists.
|
| Come on, better solutions *always* exists.
|
| It doesn't matter which program you take -- it can always be
| better. Arguing like this will not g
> | Sometimes a hack is fully sufficient.
>
> Not when a better solution exists.
Come on, better solutions *always* exists.
It doesn't matter which program you take -- it can always be
better. Arguing like this will not get you anywhere.
It's a question of priorities: Will we spent one hour
"Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Hacks have a tendency to stay _way_ longer that you would ever
| > imagine.
|
| Sometimes a hack is fully sufficient.
Not when a better solution exists.
Hacks should be temporary, and one should always try to find ways to
remove hacks.
> Hacks have a tendency to stay _way_ longer that you would ever
> imagine.
Sometimes a hack is fully sufficient.
Greets,
Asger
"Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > You are probably right with both assumptions. However, the result is a
| > hack *and* not what a 'native' LaTeX speaker would expect. I'd rather
| > admit a shortcoming than to hack around. Some day we might be able to
| > display arbitra
> You are probably right with both assumptions. However, the result is a
> hack *and* not what a 'native' LaTeX speaker would expect. I'd rather
> admit a shortcoming than to hack around. Some day we might be able to
> display arbitrary bitmaps in any place.
Doing a hack now will not prevent us f
Tue Nov 23 1999, Alejandro Aguilar Sierra ->
> > How hard is it to use unicode to display fonts.
> > I have a unicode font installed, which has almost all of the math
> > symbols used in both normal math and in ams math.
>
> Where can we get that font?
I got a lot of unicode fonts from links fou
On 22 Nov 1999, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> OK, I'll try that. BTW, Alejandro, I noticed recently that it is now
> possible to insert spaces in math formulas. I doubt that it is
> intended... Could you have a look? And there was also a patch for
> using primes and subscript earlier; is it corre
On Tue, 23 Nov 1999, Martin Norbäck wrote:
> How hard is it to use unicode to display fonts.
> I have a unicode font installed, which has almost all of the math
> symbols used in both normal math and in ams math.
Where can we get that font?
> The mathed could just check for the existence of th
Mon Nov 22 1999, Alejandro Aguilar Sierra ->
> On 22 Nov 1999, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> > I agree on that. Alejandro, would you have objections? Of course, a
> > lot of people who used to use epsilon and be pleased to see it
> > displayed on screen will not like that, and I am sure we woul
> Regarding epsilon and varepsilon:
> May I suggest that we map both varepsilon and epsilon to
> varepsilon? This is only a problem when you want to use
> both variants in a document, and that is in my experience
> very seldom, so the mayority of users will be happier.
You are probably right wit
Regarding epsilon and varepsilon:
May I suggest that we map both varepsilon and epsilon to
varepsilon? This is only a problem when you want to use
both variants in a document, and that is in my experience
very seldom, so the mayority of users will be happier.
It's much nicer to see something tha
> "Alejandro" == Alejandro Aguilar Sierra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alejandro> On 22 Nov 1999, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> I think we should. People will be angry on the short term, but it
>> is cleaner in the long term...
Alejandro> Then I'll let it to you as an exercise. ;-)
OK, I'll
On 22 Nov 1999, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I think we should. People will be angry on the short term, but it is
> cleaner in the long term...
Then I'll let it to you as an exercise. ;-)
> Is it possible to make composite characters (eg epsilon==c+-) for
> displaying or is the architecture
> "Alejandro" == Alejandro Aguilar Sierra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alejandro> I think we decided to display epsilon (dressed as
Alejandro> varepsilon) because it was often used by the mathed users
Alejandro> at that time. Anyway this is not correct so I agreed to
Alejandro> change it. Do y
On 22 Nov 1999, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I agree on that. Alejandro, would you have objections? Of course, a
> lot of people who used to use epsilon and be pleased to see it
> displayed on screen will not like that, and I am sure we would get a
> lot of bug reports.
I think we decided to di
> Rainer> would be the more natural decision.
>
> I agree on that. Alejandro, would you have objections? Of course, a
> lot of people who used to use epsilon and be pleased to see it
> displayed on screen will not like that, and I am sure we would get a
> lot of bug reports.
>
> I do not know wh
> "Rainer" == Rainer Dorsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rainer> I think
Rainer> - Do not display \epsilon at all - Diplayt \varepsilon
Rainer> correctly
Rainer> would be the more natural decision.
I agree on that. Alejandro, would you have objections? Of course, a
lot of people who used to
> Unfortunately, the X symbol font that is used for mathed does not have
> all the symbols that LyX needs. In particular, \epsilon is not here.
> The choice has been made to use \varepsilon instead, but this should
> maybe be changed...
>
Thanks for the reply.
Hmm...
\varepsilon is in the X-f
> "Rainer" == Rainer Dorsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rainer> In lyx 1.1.2 (Debian Linux) epsilon is diplayed as varepsilon,
Rainer> varepsilon is written as LaTeX command. The math panel
Rainer> displays them correctly.
Rainer> Please querry for futher information if necessary.
Unfortuna
27 matches
Mail list logo
