Mon Nov 22 1999, Alejandro Aguilar Sierra ->
> On 22 Nov 1999, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> > I agree on that. Alejandro, would you have objections? Of course, a
> > lot of people who used to use epsilon and be pleased to see it
> > displayed on screen will not like that, and I am sure we would get a
> > lot of bug reports.
>
> I think we decided to display epsilon (dressed as varepsilon) because it
> was often used by the mathed users at that time. Anyway this is not
> correct so I agreed to change it. Do you want to do it, Jean Marc?
>
> > I do not know what is the best solution now...
>
> The best solution is to display all the symbols, but we can't make it
> cleanly right now. This will change soon.
How hard is it to use unicode to display fonts.
I have a unicode font installed, which has almost all of the math
symbols used in both normal math and in ams math.
The mathed could just check for the existence of these glyphs in the
unicode font specified, and if there are none, fall back to using symbol
or just display the LaTeX code.
Does anyone know if there is a mapping from LaTeX math codes to unicode
glyph codes? If there isn't, I approximate this to be about 5 hours of
work, which I would gladly spend.
n.
--
[ http://www.dtek.chalmers.se/~d95mback/ ] [ PGP: 0x453504F1 ] [ UIN: 4439498 ]
Opinions expressed above are mine, and not those of my future employees.
Skingra er! Det finns ingenting att förstå!
PGP signature
