On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> It seems like I am the only one, who is - in theory - able to run LyX with
> Purify. Indeed, I really would like to do that but LyX 1.2cvs does not compile
> with SUN CC 6.0. In fact, the situation has become even worse since the last
> time I complain
Hello,
I think it does not make sense to consider GNU Checker as it requires to
recompile everything, including all libraries, e.g. xforms.
It seems like I am the only one, who is - in theory - able to run LyX with
Purify. Indeed, I really would like to do that but LyX 1.2cvs does not compile
w
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 02:53:27PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Unfortunately, I cannot try this out under purify, since it only works
> with gcc 2.8.1 and we don't support that anymore :( We also have
> Insure++ here, but our licence has expired :( :(
>
> Are there other tools that could
> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dekel> On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 02:53:27PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Dekel> wrote:
>> Unfortunately, I cannot try this out under purify, since it only
>> works with gcc 2.8.1 and we don't support that anymore :( We also
>> have Insure++ her
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> | At last you see this too :)
>>
>> This seems like some memory corruption/uninitilaized variables
>> (more specifically the paragraph next pointer in the cloned
>> structure for use in undo)
John> phew, good, I thought it was just me. I
On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> Well it seems very strange that this does not happen with egcs 2.91.66 and
> also does not happen if you omit -O (no optimization), for me this seems like
> a bug in the 2.96.x compiler when optimizing!
>
> Jürgen
Quite possibly. I wonder if the
On 06-Apr-2001 John Levon wrote:
>> | At last you see this too :)
>>
>> This seems like some memory corruption/uninitilaized variables (more
>> specifically the paragraph next pointer in the cloned structure for
>> use in undo)
>
> phew, good, I thought it was just me. I couldn't reproduce this
> | At last you see this too :)
>
> This seems like some memory corruption/uninitilaized variables (more
> specifically the paragraph next pointer in the cloned structure for
> use in undo)
phew, good, I thought it was just me. I couldn't reproduce this at university
(compiler egcs 2.91.66) but
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 06-Apr-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| >
| > I am currently seeing crashes when inserting stuff in InsetTabular, do
| > others see this?
| >
| > It seems that the CreateUndo is doing something wrong (or that some
| > Clone... hmmm da hmm... is do
On 06-Apr-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> I am currently seeing crashes when inserting stuff in InsetTabular, do
> others see this?
>
> It seems that the CreateUndo is doing something wrong (or that some
> Clone... hmmm da hmm... is doing something wrong.)
At last you see this too :)
Try
10 matches
Mail list logo
