Re: Client side decorations?

2023-05-14 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Sonntag, dem 14.05.2023 um 16:37 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: > What is the distribution that you use? OpenSuse Tumbleweed here. -- Jürgen -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Re: Client side decorations?

2023-05-14 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 14/05/2023 à 15:18, lorenzobertin...@gmail.com a écrit : It does not use server-side decorations with ubuntu. The thing is a complete mystery to me. Ubuntu is still defaulting to X11, and when run under that server mutter should draw decorations. What platform is Qt selecting? I have a way

Re: Client side decorations?

2023-05-14 Thread lorenzobertini97
Il giorno dom, 14/05/2023 alle 14.50 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes ha scritto: > Le 14/05/2023 à 13:59, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : > > Am Samstag, dem 13.05.2023 um 21:57 +0200 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > > > What does it mean "using"? It's decision in the userspace > > > configuration or you need to lo

Re: Client side decorations?

2023-05-14 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 14/05/2023 à 13:59, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : Am Samstag, dem 13.05.2023 um 21:57 +0200 schrieb Pavel Sanda: What does it mean "using"? It's decision in the userspace configuration or you need to locally patch the source code? I'm having export QT_QPA_PLATFORMTHEME=gnome in ~/.profile

Re: Client side decorations?

2023-05-14 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Samstag, dem 13.05.2023 um 21:57 +0200 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > What does it mean "using"? It's decision in the userspace > configuration or you need to locally patch the source code? I'm having export QT_QPA_PLATFORMTHEME=gnome in ~/.profile -- Jürgen -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lis

Re: Client side decorations?

2023-05-13 Thread lorenzobertini97
Il giorno sab, 13/05/2023 alle 21.57 +0200, Pavel Sanda ha scritto: > On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 07:04:24PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote > > > > FWIW I am using that and I am quite satisfied with the result. > > What does it mean "using"? It's decision in the userspace > configuration > or you ne

Re: Client side decorations?

2023-05-13 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 07:04:24PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Donnerstag, dem 11.05.2023 um 19:32 +0200 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > > There seems to exist QGnomePlatform & Adwaita-qt which might be of > > help. > > FWIW I am using that and I am quite satisfied with the result. What does it

Re: Client side decorations?

2023-05-13 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Donnerstag, dem 11.05.2023 um 19:32 +0200 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > There seems to exist QGnomePlatform & Adwaita-qt which might be of > help. FWIW I am using that and I am quite satisfied with the result. -- Jürgen -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/

Re: Client side decorations?

2023-05-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Le 11/05/2023 à 19:32, Pavel Sanda a écrit : On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 06:46:09PM +0200, lorenzobertin...@gmail.com wrote: Il giorno gio, 11/05/2023 alle 17.51 +0200, Pavel Sanda ha scritto: I am really new to the debate and do not know the backgrounds, but how is wayland + mutter supposed to de

Re: Client side decorations?

2023-05-11 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 06:46:09PM +0200, lorenzobertin...@gmail.com wrote: > Il giorno gio, 11/05/2023 alle 17.51 +0200, Pavel Sanda ha scritto: > > > > I am really new to the debate and do not know the backgrounds, > > but how is wayland + mutter supposed to deliver united graphical > > experien

Re: Client side decorations?

2023-05-11 Thread lorenzobertini97
Il giorno gio, 11/05/2023 alle 17.51 +0200, Pavel Sanda ha scritto: > > I am really new to the debate and do not know the backgrounds, > but how is wayland + mutter supposed to deliver united graphical > experience if every non-gtk application is supposed to draw it's > own decorations? It's a de

Re: Client side decorations?

2023-05-11 Thread Pavel Sanda
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 04:38:52PM +0200, lorenzobertin...@gmail.com wrote: > I've been facing this problem for a while: LyX, and in general Qt > programs, don't draw a shadow or have a proper titlebar under wayland > in the GNOME desktop environment, or really any desktop that uses > mutter. See a

Re: client

2011-02-11 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:38:31AM +0100, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > Op 11-2-2011 11:26, Peter Kümmel schreef: > >On 11.02.2011 11:02, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > >>On 02/11/2011 01:08 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > >>> Op 11-2-2011 1:02, Enrico Forestieri schreef: > On Fri, Feb 11,

Re: client

2011-02-11 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Op 11-2-2011 11:26, Peter Kümmel schreef: On 11.02.2011 11:02, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: On 02/11/2011 01:08 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Op 11-2-2011 1:02, Enrico Forestieri schreef: On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:54:02AM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote: Am I the only one where client does not

Re: client

2011-02-11 Thread Peter Kümmel
On 11.02.2011 11:02, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: On 02/11/2011 01:08 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Op 11-2-2011 1:02, Enrico Forestieri schreef: On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:54:02AM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote: Am I the only one where client does not build? I have to move TexRow.cpp/.h to supp

Re: client

2011-02-11 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
On 02/11/2011 01:08 AM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: Op 11-2-2011 1:02, Enrico Forestieri schreef: On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:54:02AM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote: Am I the only one where client does not build? I have to move TexRow.cpp/.h to support to fix it. Should I commit? It compiles an

Re: client

2011-02-10 Thread Peter Kümmel
On 11.02.2011 01:04, Pavel Sanda wrote: Enrico Forestieri wrote: On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:54:02AM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote: Am I the only one where client does not build? I have to move TexRow.cpp/.h to support to fix it. Should I commit? It compiles and links fine here. +1 isn't it r

Re: client

2011-02-10 Thread Peter Kümmel
On 11.02.2011 01:05, Enrico Forestieri wrote: On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 01:02:03AM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote: On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:54:02AM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote: Am I the only one where client does not build? I have to move TexRow.cpp/.h to support to fix it. Should I commit? I

Re: client

2011-02-10 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Op 11-2-2011 1:02, Enrico Forestieri schreef: On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:54:02AM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote: Am I the only one where client does not build? I have to move TexRow.cpp/.h to support to fix it. Should I commit? It compiles and links fine here. No problem here either, but that mi

Re: client

2011-02-10 Thread Pavel Sanda
Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:54:02AM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote: > > Am I the only one where client does not build? > > > > I have to move TexRow.cpp/.h to support to fix it. > > > > Should I commit? > > It compiles and links fine here. +1 isn't it rather cmake issue? p

Re: client

2011-02-10 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 01:02:03AM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:54:02AM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote: > > Am I the only one where client does not build? > > > > I have to move TexRow.cpp/.h to support to fix it. > > > > Should I commit? > > It compiles and links fine

Re: client

2011-02-10 Thread Enrico Forestieri
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:54:02AM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote: > Am I the only one where client does not build? > > I have to move TexRow.cpp/.h to support to fix it. > > Should I commit? It compiles and links fine here. -- Enrico