Re: beta release

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Georg can you confirm that 5c2d0499 (and the amendment at 9267b2b2) is > all we need to do for 2.2.0 regarding #9841? Yes, this is fine now. I did also update the docs regarding the swapped \output_changes position using the experimental mode of updatedocs.py which work

Re: beta release

On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 08:12:54PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > Does any one view an issue as a beta blocker? > > The current situation regarding \output_changes is not good, so I would see > http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9841 as a beta blocker. > > Fortunately Guill

Re: beta release

Le 12/01/2016 22:06, Enrico Forestieri a écrit : On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 04:51:34PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:45:53PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote: I hope both of you are not serious. I was completely serious. I did not follow the issue and did not want to in

Re: beta release

On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 11:06:25PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 04:51:34PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:45:53PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > > > > > I hope both of you are not serious. > > > > I was completely serious. I did not

Re: beta release

On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 04:51:34PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:45:53PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > > > I hope both of you are not serious. > > I was completely serious. I did not follow the issue and did not want to > invest the time when I know there were o

Re: beta release

On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:45:53PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 07:30:30PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > I looked at the thread (actually it timed out for me but I could search > > the MID and found it on mail-archive here [1]). From what I see, there > > is no

Re: beta release

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 07:30:30PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > I looked at the thread (actually it timed out for me but I could search > the MID and found it on mail-archive here [1]). From what I see, there > is no response to that message. Eh, you got a bronze contract service and that on

Re: beta release

On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 08:46:04PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote: > >>Also, what is this timeout issue? Some people do not get new messages sent > >>to old threads? > > > >I don't understand. Did I bring up the timeout issue? Which quoted text > >are you referring to? > > below > > >>>I looked at

Re: beta release

Le 12/01/2016 20:28, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : Can anyone +1 this issue as a beta blocker? I did not follow the discussion closely. I think this should be done before release. Does it mean that I have to make it a beta blocker? No. In my opinion, a beta blocker is something that falls into

Re: beta release

On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 03:28:28PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > I think this should be done before release. Does it mean that I have to make > > it a beta blocker? > > No. In my opinion, a beta blocker is something that falls into one of > the following categories: > > (1) a fix for a bug t

Re: beta release

On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 05:30:14PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 12/01/2016 00:30, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > >On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 06:28:02PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote: > >>Le 09/01/2016 00:15, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > >>> > >>>Does any one view an issue as a beta blocker? > >> > >>

Re: beta release

Le 12/01/2016 00:30, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 06:28:02PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote: Le 09/01/2016 00:15, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : Does any one view an issue as a beta blocker? The situation with the parbreak separator is not good and I would see changing its symb

Re: beta release

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 06:28:02PM +, Guillaume Munch wrote: > Le 09/01/2016 00:15, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > > >Does any one view an issue as a beta blocker? > > The situation with the parbreak separator is not good and I would see > changing its symbol and fixing the insertion of an empt

Re: beta release

Le 09/01/2016 00:15, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : Does any one view an issue as a beta blocker? The situation with the parbreak separator is not good and I would see changing its symbol and fixing the insertion of an empty environment before with Enter (described at the beginning of

Re: beta release

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Does any one view an issue as a beta blocker? The current situation regarding \output_changes is not good, so I would see http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/9841 as a beta blocker. Fortunately Guillaume implemented a proper solution, so the only thing which is needed is th

Re: beta release

On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 11:03:53PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 03:36:52PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: > > > On 01/09/2016 03:01 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > Le 09/01/2016 01:15, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > >> Georg's patch still needs a final +1: > > >> http

Re: beta release

On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 03:36:52PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: > On 01/09/2016 03:01 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > Le 09/01/2016 01:15, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > >> Georg's patch still needs a final +1: > >> https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=mid&q=n6have%24b5i%244%40ger.gmane.org > >> >

Re: beta release

On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 03:36:52PM -0500, Richard Heck wrote: > On 01/09/2016 03:01 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > Le 09/01/2016 01:15, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > >> Georg's patch still needs a final +1: > >> https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=mid&q=n6have%24b5i%244%40ger.gmane.org > >> >

Re: beta release

On 01/09/2016 03:01 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 09/01/2016 01:15, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >> Georg's patch still needs a final +1: >> https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=mid&q=n6have%24b5i%244%40ger.gmane.org >> >> JMarc did you have any other concerns with it? Does anyone else? > > Un

Re: beta release

Le 09/01/2016 01:15, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : Georg's patch still needs a final +1: https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=mid&q=n6have%24b5i%244%40ger.gmane.org JMarc did you have any other concerns with it? Does anyone else? Unfortunately I do not know much about this origin business. My comm