On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 04:51:34PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:45:53PM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote: > > > > I hope both of you are not serious. > > I was completely serious. I did not follow the issue and did not want to > invest the time when I know there were other developers who are familiar > with the issue and thus understand its importance. I think that every > developer should be allowed to propose an issue as a beta blocker and I > would prefer for a separate developer to +1 that proposal.
Then, please don't be surprised that I am scared by the fact that a stupid thing can be tacken as a blocker. > In any case, Guillaume has withdrawn his proposal that it be a beta > blocker after a discussion on what I view a beta blocker to be (I'm > still interested in feedback on other opinions on that thread if there > are any). If things like that are blockers, lyx 2.2 would never be released. -- Enrico
