Re: an even uglier conversion

2002-02-14 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 01:24:08PM -0500, Richard E. Hawkins wrote: > I see no current way around this but to learn enough latex to write all > the math for my captions in latex, as it seems impossible to paste the > math inset into the ERT. You could copy open the .lyx file in a text editor. T

Re: an even uglier conversion

2002-02-13 Thread Herbert Voss
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > hmm. That's how all of these started--real ERT, then ERT off for my > text, then an ERT } to close the caption. Conversion left my last > caption as plain. Could I have just changed it back?? I had this several times with my 1.1.6 docs. But I can't remember if

Re: an even uglier conversion

2002-02-13 Thread Herbert Voss
Herbert Voss wrote: > no, inside ert is only ert! but you can left ert ^ "leave" may be a better word ... :-) HErbert -- http://www.lyx.org/help/

Re: an even uglier conversion

2002-02-13 Thread Herbert Voss
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > So if I'm reading this right, the problem isn't that ert can't have > insets, but that an ert within a float can't have insets? > > Or is it that the nesting limit for insets is 1? no, inside ert is only ert! but you can left ert with an open end, means only an ope

Re: an even uglier conversion

2002-02-13 Thread Herbert Voss
Richard E. Hawkins wrote: > I've found two more of the same type of misconversion, but now a worse > one: I used lyx math inside the long caption (within the {} ). The > ERT ends at the first math inset. > > I see no current way around this but to learn enough latex to write all > the math

Re: an even uglier conversion

2002-02-13 Thread Angus Leeming
On Wednesday 13 February 2002 6:24 pm, Richard E. Hawkins wrote: > I've found two more of the same type of misconversion, but now a worse > one: I used lyx math inside the long caption (within the {} ). The > ERT ends at the first math inset. > > I see no current way around this but to learn