Re: A question (changining the local config directory) and two feature requests (search wildcards and cancel package support)

2010-07-20 Thread Tommaso Cucinotta
Il 15/07/2010 05:07, Richard Heck ha scritto: On 07/14/2010 10:49 PM, Jacob Barandes wrote: Now two feature questions about 2.0. Is there any possibility that the advanced search might support wildcards? That way if a user needs to change, say, x^{} to x_{} for various possible choices of , th

Re: A question (changining the local config directory) and two feature requests (search wildcards and cancel package support)

2010-07-14 Thread Richard Heck
On 07/14/2010 10:49 PM, Jacob Barandes wrote: Hi, LyX is working great, and alpha4 is looking excellent. First, a question. I can build 2.0-alpha4, and its additional features (like the advanced search) nicely augment my install of 1.6 when I need ot use them, but I'd like it to use a differe

Re: A question about \font_encoding used for generating preamble of LaTeX source

2010-03-21 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Mikhail Petrov wrote: > Probably, it would be a good improvement of further LyX versions if it > allow one to set TeX encodings for each document like it is realized for > input encoding of the source. LyX 2.0 will have this. Jürgen

Re: a question about configure.py's check for LaTeX-packages

2006-08-06 Thread Bo Peng
Bo> I am adding this to the trunk, and I will have to ask JMarc for Bo> putting this to 1.4.x (after he gets back from vacation). Please apply it (or do you want me to do it?) Done. Bo

Re: a question about configure.py's check for LaTeX-packages

2006-08-06 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Many thanks, it works perfectly. If possible please add this to the >> 1.4.x tree and to trunk. Bo> I am adding this to the trunk, and I will have to ask JMarc for Bo> putting this to 1.4.x (after he gets back from vacation). Please apply it (

Re: a question about configure.py's check for LaTeX-packages

2006-07-27 Thread Bo Peng
Many thanks, it works perfectly. If possible please add this to the 1.4.x tree and to trunk. I am adding this to the trunk, and I will have to ask JMarc for putting this to 1.4.x (after he gets back from vacation). Cheers, Bo

Re: a question about configure.py's check for LaTeX-packages

2006-07-27 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Bo Peng wrote: Please test the attached patch, which reads output from latex immediately after they are available. Many thanks, it works perfectly. If possible please add this to the 1.4.x tree and to trunk. thanks and regards Uwe

Re: a question about configure.py's check for LaTeX-packages

2006-07-26 Thread Bo Peng
I will see what I can do. Please test the attached patch, which reads output from latex immediately after they are available. Cheers, Bo Index: lib/configure.py === --- lib/configure.py (revision 14498) +++ lib/configure.py (workin

Re: a question about configure.py's check for LaTeX-packages

2006-07-26 Thread Bo Peng
The old configure script (for the sh-shell) printed out which LaTeX-package is currently cecked for so that the user got a feedback. configure.py only prints "+checking list of textclasses... " but not the name of the currently checked package. Why was this feature not implemented in configure.p

Re: A question about lengths and reLyX

2003-02-12 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 11:02:52AM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > Thank you. All is clearer now. Would verbatimItem return '4.5 \columnwidth' > too? Yes. It looks for something within balanced braces. Not entirely correct, but not too far off. > One more thing: LyX can read all of minipage's opti

Re: A question about lengths and reLyX

2003-02-12 Thread Angus Leeming
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 10:55 am, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 10:50:30AM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > > >> Sure. One question. Would ' - 4,5 cM ' count as one token or two? > > > > > > Six. - 4 5 , c M. > > > > > > The conversion has to be done on output. > > > > ??? Ok.

Re: A question about lengths and reLyX

2003-02-12 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 10:50:30AM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > >> Sure. One question. Would ' - 4,5 cM ' count as one token or two? > > > > Six. - 4 5 , c M. > > > > The conversion has to be done on output. > > ??? Ok. You tokenise and then parse. Fair enough. But wrong. Tokenization should

Re: A question about lengths and reLyX

2003-02-12 Thread Angus Leeming
Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 10:06:56AM +, Angus Leeming wrote: >> > Currently I like the idea of tex2lyx being small and independent very >> > much. >> >> Sure. One question. Would ' - 4,5 cM ' count as one token or two? > > Six. - 4 5 , c M. > > The conversion has to be

Re: A question about lengths and reLyX

2003-02-12 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 10:06:56AM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > > Currently I like the idea of tex2lyx being small and independent very much. > > Sure. One question. Would ' - 4,5 cM ' count as one token or two? Six. - 4 5 , c M. The conversion has to be done on output. Andre' -- Those who

Re: A question about lengths and reLyX

2003-02-12 Thread Kornel Benko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2003 10:21, Angus Leeming wrote: ... > > $ ./trial ' - 3.5 cM' ' + 4,5 Cm ' ' + 4.5 \columnWidth ' > ' - 3.5 cM' becomes '-3.5cm' > ' + 4,5 Cm ' becomes '+4.5cm' > ' + 4.5 \columnWidth ' becomes '+4.5\columnWidth' You may miss '.3 cm' >

Re: A question about lengths and reLyX

2003-02-12 Thread Angus Leeming
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 9:40 am, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 09:38:06AM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > > Should I write the equivalent of this as a function for tex2lyx using the > > boost regex library? > > Overkill. > > Better use a simple loop over the string than adding

Re: A question about lengths and reLyX

2003-02-12 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 11:00:33AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > While I agree about being independent from boost, you will have to > have some dependency on the lyx sources: the parsing of things like > \section depends on the .layout files, and I do not think it would be > wise to do a re-

Re: A question about lengths and reLyX

2003-02-12 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andre> Currently I like the idea of tex2lyx being small and Andre> independent very much. While I agree about being independent from boost, you will have to have some dependency on the lyx sources: the parsing of things like \section dep

Re: A question about lengths and reLyX

2003-02-12 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 09:38:06AM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > Should I write the equivalent of this as a function for tex2lyx using the > boost regex library? Overkill. Better use a simple loop over the string than adding a dependance on boost stuff. Currently I like the idea of tex2lyx bein

Re: A question about lengths and reLyX

2003-02-12 Thread Angus Leeming
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 9:31 am, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 09:21:12AM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > > > And I believe '4.5 Cm' and '4.5 cM' are valid as well... > > > > Geeez. > > Someone should check it first That's why I gave you a little program to run, you noodle

Re: A question about lengths and reLyX

2003-02-12 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 09:21:12AM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > > And I believe '4.5 Cm' and '4.5 cM' are valid as well... > > Geeez. Someone should check it first > Would this suffice do you think? > $LatexLength =~ s/^\s*([+-]?)\s*(\d+)[.,]?(\d*)\s*/$1$2.$3/; > # Now ensu

Re: A question about lengths and reLyX

2003-02-12 Thread Angus Leeming
Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 09:47:13PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: >> Am Dienstag, 11. Februar 2003 12:00 schrieb Angus Leeming: >> > I have a trivial patch to the reLyX minibuffer output: >> > >> > * reLyX/BasicLyX.pm: Wrap minipage width and height output in >> >

Re: A question about lengths and reLyX

2003-02-11 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 09:47:13PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > Am Dienstag, 11. Februar 2003 12:00 schrieb Angus Leeming: > > I have a trivial patch to the reLyX minibuffer output: > > > > * reLyX/BasicLyX.pm: Wrap minipage width and height output in > > inverted commas to keep the L

Re: A question about lengths and reLyX

2003-02-11 Thread Georg Baum
Am Dienstag, 11. Februar 2003 12:00 schrieb Angus Leeming: > I have a trivial patch to the reLyX minibuffer output: > > * reLyX/BasicLyX.pm: Wrap minipage width and height output in > inverted commas to keep the LyX parser happy with "4.5 cm". > (Note the space.) While you

Re: A question about lengths and reLyX

2003-02-11 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 03:02:52PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Andre> Of course, if at one point of time the format has evolved too > Andre> far, tex2lyx might get an update. > > Like reLyX that produces a strange file format with a mix of old > constructs and new ones... Not necessarily

Re: A question about lengths and reLyX

2003-02-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andre> But it has certain benefits: Andre> - No dependence on LyX proper. - Small. - No need to access Andre> fragile LyX internals. Indeed. But at least, when the internals change, you know about it because it does not compile anymore

Re: A question about lengths and reLyX

2003-02-11 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 02:46:48PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Andre> The tokenizer should be ok unless someone starts changing > Andre> catcodes ore redefines macros. The "backend" (i.e. writing the > Andre> proper .lyx constructs) is far from working, let alone > Andre> complete... > >

Re: A question about lengths and reLyX

2003-02-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andre> The tokenizer should be ok unless someone starts changing Andre> catcodes ore redefines macros. The "backend" (i.e. writing the Andre> proper .lyx constructs) is far from working, let alone Andre> complete... Are you sure that prod

Re: A question about lengths and reLyX

2003-02-11 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 1:21 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | > $ mkdir src/tex2lyx/.deps > | > $ touch src/tex2lyx/.deps/tex2lyx.Po > | > > | > solves the problem. Should it be generated automatically or cvs added? > > No! > > That was something wr

Re: A question about lengths and reLyX

2003-02-11 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > $ mkdir src/tex2lyx/.deps | > $ touch src/tex2lyx/.deps/tex2lyx.Po | > | > solves the problem. Should it be generated automatically or cvs added? No! That was something wrong on your end. a autogen, re-configure, make distclean etc would have fixed

Re: A question about lengths and reLyX

2003-02-11 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 01:12:33PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > As JMarc noted yesterday, this approach: > else if (t.cs() == "usepackage") { > string const options = getArg('[', ']'); > string const name = getArg('{', '}'); >

Re: A question about lengths and reLyX

2003-02-11 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 12:51:24PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > I wonder too. However, my motivation has been: > 1. learn enough perl to feel comfortable when confronted with it. > 2. LyX 1.3 will be around for at least 6 months. Currently there is no dependency on LyX in tex2lyx (quite contrary

Re: A question about lengths and reLyX

2003-02-11 Thread Angus Leeming
Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 11:00:37AM +, Angus Leeming wrote: >> I have a trivial patch to the reLyX minibuffer output: >> >> * reLyX/BasicLyX.pm: Wrap minipage width and height output in >> inverted commas to keep the LyX parser happy with "4.5 cm". >>

Re: A question about lengths and reLyX

2003-02-11 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 11 February 2003 12:39 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 11:00:37AM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > > I have a trivial patch to the reLyX minibuffer output: > > > > * reLyX/BasicLyX.pm: Wrap minipage width and height output in > > inverted commas to keep th

Re: A question about lengths and reLyX

2003-02-11 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 11:00:37AM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > I have a trivial patch to the reLyX minibuffer output: > > * reLyX/BasicLyX.pm: Wrap minipage width and height output in > inverted commas to keep the LyX parser happy with "4.5 cm". > (Note the space.) > > H

Re: a question

2002-12-16 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 08:12:16PM +0100, Lina Yordanova wrote: > Haloo, > I would like to insert and process text in bulgarian language in lyx. I used > to have phonetic bulgarian keyboard in other applications but in lyx I > suspect it is impossible. > 1. Only bg-bds-cp1251.kmap is availabl

Re: A question about a comment...

2002-12-06 Thread Angus Leeming
On Friday 06 December 2002 5:28 pm, Angus Leeming wrote: > >  gives "Unknown function" > > U. It looks like all the interesting ones are missed. I'll dig into > xforms. The phrase "wilfully perverse" springs to mind... Does anyone have any idea why they attempt this weirdness and not pass the

Re: A question about a comment...

2002-12-06 Thread Angus Leeming
On Friday 06 December 2002 3:56 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | On Friday 06 December 2002 12:23 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > >> mmm... we had a huge party at work yesterday... 13 hour party... > | > | Well here's some nice news for a sore head. I

Re: A question about a comment...

2002-12-06 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Friday 06 December 2002 12:23 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> mmm... we had a huge party at work yesterday... 13 hour party... > | Well here's some nice news for a sore head. I finally got it into my head | that all that KEYPRESS rubbish in XWorkAr

Re: A question about a comment...

2002-12-06 Thread Angus Leeming
On Friday 06 December 2002 12:23 pm, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > mmm... we had a huge party at work yesterday... 13 hour party... Well here's some nice news for a sore head. I finally got it into my head that all that KEYPRESS rubbish in XWorkArea was to work-around xforms limitations/bugs. S

Re: A question about a comment...

2002-12-06 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Friday 06 December 2002 11:47 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> | Lars, could you give me a brief précis of what you're talking about here >> | and what the xforms bug is/was. Does it still exist with xform

Re: A question about a comment...

2002-12-06 Thread Angus Leeming
On Friday 06 December 2002 11:47 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | Lars, could you give me a brief précis of what you're talking about here > | and what the xforms bug is/was. Does it still exist with xforms 1.0? > > Sometimes xforms just return key=0 ev

Re: A question about a comment...

2002-12-06 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars, could you give me a brief précis of what you're talking about here and | what the xforms bug is/was. Does it still exist with xforms 1.0? Sometimes xforms just return key=0 even if a key is pressed... or something. Or perhaps it is that keysum is

Re: a question for Herbert

2002-02-04 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 04 February 2002 3:44 pm, Herbert Voss wrote: > Angus Leeming wrote: > > > if (zippedFile(params.filename)) > > > > Am I missing a new file in your tree perhaps? > > > uups. sorry, shouldn't be. But I live with three > > parallel trees infact of own stuff and my poor > cvs k

Re: a question for Herbert

2002-02-04 Thread Herbert Voss
Angus Leeming wrote: > if (zippedFile(params.filename)) > > Am I missing a new file in your tree perhaps? uups. sorry, shouldn't be. But I live with three parallel trees infact of own stuff and my poor cvs knowledge. I'll send you a patch together with the apply-button, ok? Herbert

Re: a question

2002-01-11 Thread Angus Leeming
Sorry Hit the wrong button! A

Re: a question

2000-07-27 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> What do people prefer? Ie, shall I remove Angus> InsetUrl::EditMessage() or add InsetCitation::EditMessage()? It does not seem to me that the Opened URL message is very useful, since the user sees that the popup is opened. I think