Am Samstag, den 17.03.2018, 21:32 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> I agree that the current text is confusing. I wonder if we can
> improve
> on the confusion by just saying something like
>
> Unfortunately, official LyX 2.3.0 Windows binaries are not
> available
> at this time. The most r
On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 06:15:20PM +, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 15.03.2018, 15:08 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > > Leaving 2.2.3 as it is?
> >
> > Yes I think so.
>
> I suggest to hide the text mentioning the two installer variants (and
> pointing to 2.2.3). It proba
Am Donnerstag, den 15.03.2018, 15:08 -0400 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
> > Leaving 2.2.3 as it is?
>
> Yes I think so.
I suggest to hide the text mentioning the two installer variants (and
pointing to 2.2.3). It probably irritates more than it helps, see
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/11079
The 2.
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 07:53:56AM +, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > Yes I think so. After the text "There are 2 Windows installer
> > variants:", I think we could add the similar (adding just the version
> > info) text as in the announcement:
> >
> > Unfortunately, official
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Yes I think so. After the text "There are 2 Windows installer
> variants:", I think we could add the similar (adding just the version
> info) text as in the announcement:
>
> Unfortunately, official LyX 2.3.0 Windows binaries are not available
> at this time.
>
> Shou
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 08:28:44AM +, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > > I agree. I will remove the Windows binaries from the FTP, and announce
> > > 2.3.0 on Friday.
> >
> > For the announce email I'm currently planning to put something like the
> > following:
> >
> > Unfort
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > I agree. I will remove the Windows binaries from the FTP, and announce
> > 2.3.0 on Friday.
>
> For the announce email I'm currently planning to put something like the
> following:
>
> Unfortunately, official Windows binaries are not available at this
> time.
What
Am 15.03.2018 4:12 vorm. schrieb "Scott
I still have the hope that we can upload the Windows binaries soon.
I certainly hope so, too!
Jürgen
Scott
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 03:12:26AM +, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 06:23:31AM +, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>
> > I think (and I actually propose herewith) that we should release LyX 2.3.0
> > now, without the Windows installer.
>
> I agree. I will remove the Windows bi
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 06:23:31AM +, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> I think (and I actually propose herewith) that we should release LyX 2.3.0
> now, without the Windows installer.
I agree. I will remove the Windows binaries from the FTP, and announce
2.3.0 on Friday.
I still have the hope tha
Le 14/03/2018 à 12:52, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
AFAIU, it is too late already.
2 weeks already...
Too bad!
It's actually exactly two weeks. LyX 2.3.0 already hit testing branch of Debian.
Maybe if we filed a request at ubuntu bugzilla we might still have chance, don'
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 12:23 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> > Thanks, I sometime read the devel list just for fun :-)
>
> That's a bizarre form of masochism :)
> Where do you live now, there were some rumors we might try to organize
> development meeting after the years...
>
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> > > AFAIU, it is too late already.
> >
> > 2 weeks already...
> >
>
> Too bad!
It's actually exactly two weeks. LyX 2.3.0 already hit testing branch of Debian.
Maybe if we filed a request at ubuntu bugzilla we might still have chance, don't
know how strict they are with
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Thanks, I sometime read the devel list just for fun :-)
That's a bizarre form of masochism :)
Where do you live now, there were some rumors we might try to organize
development meeting after the years...
Pavel
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 11:14 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Le 14/03/2018 ?? 11:10, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
> >> By the way, you should definitely release now in order to get into next
> >> Ubuntu LTS release...
> >
> > AFAIU, it is too late already.
>
> 2 weeks alr
Le 14/03/2018 à 02:43, Uwe Stöhr a écrit :
[...]
So the average user does not know how LaTeX works, what a package is and how it
is installed or uninstalled.
Sure he does know if he installed LyX himself. as I pointed out in the other
thread. I tried to be an average Window user (a bit dif
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 14/03/2018 ?? 11:10, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
>> By the way, you should definitely release now in order to get into next
>> Ubuntu LTS release...
>
> AFAIU, it is too late already.
2 weeks already...
Hi Abdel, nice to hear you again!! :)
Pavel
Le 14/03/2018 à 11:10, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
By the way, you should definitely release now in order to get into next
Ubuntu LTS release...
AFAIU, it is too late already.
JMarc
PS: Hi Abdel!
By the way, you should definitely release now in order to get into next
Ubuntu LTS release...
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 11:05 AM, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> In the old days we had the Friday rule for fight... you should restore the
> tradition :-)
>
> Cheers,
> Abdel
>
>
> On Wed, Ma
Hi Guys,
In the old days we had the Friday rule for fight... you should restore the
tradition :-)
Cheers,
Abdel
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 7:23 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I have kept calm in this debate until now, but since this is getting more
> and more ridiculous, here is m
Dear all,
I have kept calm in this debate until now, but since this is getting more
and more ridiculous, here is my position.
I think (and I actually propose herewith) that we should release LyX 2.3.0
now, without the Windows installer.
It is unacceptable that one single developer holds up a maj
On 03/13/2018 09:43 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 12.03.2018 um 04:32 schrieb Richard Heck:
>
>> That is a serious mistake: to focus on "average users". But it has
>> clearly become pointless to discuss this any longer.
>
> Dear Richard,
>
> I cannot leave this commented because it is too fundamental.
Am 12.03.2018 um 04:32 schrieb Richard Heck:
That is a serious mistake: to focus on "average users". But it has
clearly become pointless to discuss this any longer.
Dear Richard,
I cannot leave this commented because it is too fundamental. I tried to
calm down, but cannot.
What is LyX for?
On 03/12/2018 12:44 AM, Andrew Parsloe wrote:
> On 12/03/2018 4:32 p.m., Richard Heck wrote:
>> On 03/11/2018 04:52 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>>> Am 11.03.2018 um 18:12 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
>>>
I think that's what we're doing. The basic disagreement we have is
that
I think adding a di
On 12/03/2018 4:32 p.m., Richard Heck wrote:
On 03/11/2018 04:52 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 11.03.2018 um 18:12 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
I think that's what we're doing. The basic disagreement we have is that
I think adding a dialog will bring more benefit than harm.
And I made clear why I am op
25 matches
Mail list logo
