On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Dekel, a quickie before I disappear:
>
> I see you're playing with insetbib.[Ch]: note that the two insets share the
> same form (horrible, I know), so if you're going to cut out InsetBibtex, you
> should regenerate this rather than remove the code enti
Dekel, a quickie before I disappear:
I see you're playing with insetbib.[Ch]: note that the two insets share the
same form (horrible, I know), so if you're going to cut out InsetBibtex, you
should regenerate this rather than remove the code entirely. Leave the
original for InsetBib.
If, of co
