If one of you takes the time to write a script to automate the procedure
* file.C -> file.cpp
* fix all references in build files and documentation
* register the rename in SVN.
* whatever other stuff it needs to do.
then the whole argument is redundant.
Just make the change, hand
José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thursday 26 October 2006 3:32 pm, Bo Peng wrote:
> > > Regarding the .C issue, although I don't like them, I think that we
> > > should postpone this to 1.6.
> >
> > I respect your decision, but please be more specific. Will this happen
> > immediately af
My proposal is to do it as soon as the xml patch goes in.
Got you. Expect huge 'svn up' after the xml merge then. :-)
Bo
On Thursday 26 October 2006 3:32 pm, Bo Peng wrote:
> > Regarding the .C issue, although I don't like them, I think that we
> > should postpone this to 1.6.
>
> I respect your decision, but please be more specific. Will this happen
> immediately after 1.5.x is released so that 1.5.x and 1.6/trunk h
Regarding the .C issue, although I don't like them, I think that we should
postpone this to 1.6.
I respect your decision, but please be more specific. Will this happen
immediately after 1.5.x is released so that 1.5.x and 1.6/trunk have
the same file extension? (Or you mean 1.6.x and 1.7?)
Bo
